iNOS is not responsible for RyR1 S-nitrosylation in mdx mice with truncated dystrophin.
Becker muscular dystrophy
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1)
iNOS
nNOS
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jul 2020
21 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
entrez:
23
7
2020
pubmed:
23
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous research indicated that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) is the key molecule for S-nitrosylation of ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1) in DMD model mice (mdx mice) and that both neuronal NOS (nNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) might contribute to the reaction because nNOS is mislocalized in the cytoplasm and iNOS expression is higher in mdx mice. We investigated the effect of iNOS on RyR1 S-nitrosylation in mdx mice and whether transgenic expression of truncated dystrophin reduced iNOS expression in mdx mice or not. Three- to 4-month-old C57BL/6 J, mdx, and transgenic mdx mice expressing exon 45-55-deleted human dystrophin (Tg/mdx mice) were used. We also generated two double mutant mice, mdx iNOS KO and Tg/mdx iNOS KO to reveal the iNOS contribution to RyR1 S-nitrosylation. nNOS and iNOS expression levels in skeletal muscle of these mice were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), qRT-PCR, and Western blotting. Total NOS activity was measured by a citrulline assay. A biotin-switch method was used for detection of RyR1 S-nitrosylation. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis. mdx and mdx iNOS KO mice showed the same level of RyR1 S-nitrosylation. Total NOS activity was not changed in mdx iNOS KO mice compared with mdx mice. iNOS expression was undetectable in Tg/mdx mice expressing exon 45-55-deleted human dystrophin, but the level of RyR1 S-nitrosylation was the same in mdx and Tg/mdx mice. Similar levels of RyR1 S-nitrosylation and total NOS activity in mdx and mdx iNOS KO demonstrated that the proportion of iNOS in total NOS activity was low, even in mdx mice. Exon 45-55-deleted dystrophin reduced the expression level of iNOS, but it did not correct the RyR1 S-nitrosylation. These results indicate that iNOS was not involved in RyR1 S-nitrosylation in mdx and Tg/mdx mice muscles.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous research indicated that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) is the key molecule for S-nitrosylation of ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1) in DMD model mice (mdx mice) and that both neuronal NOS (nNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) might contribute to the reaction because nNOS is mislocalized in the cytoplasm and iNOS expression is higher in mdx mice. We investigated the effect of iNOS on RyR1 S-nitrosylation in mdx mice and whether transgenic expression of truncated dystrophin reduced iNOS expression in mdx mice or not.
METHODS
METHODS
Three- to 4-month-old C57BL/6 J, mdx, and transgenic mdx mice expressing exon 45-55-deleted human dystrophin (Tg/mdx mice) were used. We also generated two double mutant mice, mdx iNOS KO and Tg/mdx iNOS KO to reveal the iNOS contribution to RyR1 S-nitrosylation. nNOS and iNOS expression levels in skeletal muscle of these mice were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), qRT-PCR, and Western blotting. Total NOS activity was measured by a citrulline assay. A biotin-switch method was used for detection of RyR1 S-nitrosylation. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
mdx and mdx iNOS KO mice showed the same level of RyR1 S-nitrosylation. Total NOS activity was not changed in mdx iNOS KO mice compared with mdx mice. iNOS expression was undetectable in Tg/mdx mice expressing exon 45-55-deleted human dystrophin, but the level of RyR1 S-nitrosylation was the same in mdx and Tg/mdx mice.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Similar levels of RyR1 S-nitrosylation and total NOS activity in mdx and mdx iNOS KO demonstrated that the proportion of iNOS in total NOS activity was low, even in mdx mice. Exon 45-55-deleted dystrophin reduced the expression level of iNOS, but it did not correct the RyR1 S-nitrosylation. These results indicate that iNOS was not involved in RyR1 S-nitrosylation in mdx and Tg/mdx mice muscles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32693782
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03501-0
pii: 10.1186/s12891-020-03501-0
pmc: PMC7374827
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dystrophin
0
Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel
0
ryanodine receptor 1, mouse
0
Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II
EC 1.14.13.39
Nos2 protein, mouse
EC 1.14.13.39
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
479Subventions
Organisme : Intramural research grants for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders
ID : 28-6
Références
J Gene Med. 2008 Jun;10(6):702-13
pubmed: 18338831
J Exp Med. 1992 Aug 1;176(2):599-604
pubmed: 1380065
Nat Med. 2009 Mar;15(3):325-30
pubmed: 19198614
J Pathol. 2011 Jan;223(1):88-98
pubmed: 21125668
J Biochem. 2016 Feb;159(2):171-9
pubmed: 26314333
J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 22;274(4):2193-200
pubmed: 9890982
Cell Calcium. 1992 Jun-Jul;13(6-7):427-34
pubmed: 1380405
Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Oct;45(4):498-506
pubmed: 2491009
Cell Stem Cell. 2016 Apr 7;18(4):533-40
pubmed: 26877224
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 1;21(15):3449-60
pubmed: 22589245
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):9142-7
pubmed: 8799168
Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Apr 12;9(7):1033-40
pubmed: 10767327
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21618
pubmed: 21738735
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13763-8
pubmed: 22869723
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;3(2):193-7
pubmed: 11175752
Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):919-28
pubmed: 3319190
EBioMedicine. 2016 Sep;11:253-261
pubmed: 27544065
Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):225-8
pubmed: 1373522
J Clin Invest. 2009 Mar;119(3):624-35
pubmed: 19229108
Hum Mutat. 2007 Feb;28(2):196-202
pubmed: 17041910
J Neurol Sci. 1995 Apr;129(2):97-105
pubmed: 7608742
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;6(2):150-66
pubmed: 15688001
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Feb 1;18(3):482-96
pubmed: 18996917
Hum Gene Ther. 2016 Sep;27(9):712-26
pubmed: 27279388
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Feb;43(2):283-6
pubmed: 21254096
Mol Med. 2001 May;7(5):355-64
pubmed: 11474581
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Oct 20;505(1):51-59
pubmed: 30236982
J Clin Neurosci. 2008 Jul;15(7):757-63
pubmed: 18261911
Physiol Rev. 2016 Jan;96(1):253-305
pubmed: 26676145
Nat Med. 2013 Jan;19(1):101-6
pubmed: 23202294
Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):743-52
pubmed: 7545544