Medroxyprogesterone acetate used in ovarian stimulation is associated with reduced mature oocyte retrieval and blastocyst development: a matched cohort study of 825 freeze-all IVF cycles.
Adult
Blastocyst
/ drug effects
Embryo Transfer
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Hormone Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Humans
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques
/ methods
Live Birth
/ epidemiology
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
/ administration & dosage
Oocyte Retrieval
/ methods
Oocytes
/ drug effects
Ovulation Induction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
/ methods
Co-treatment
Flexible start
Freeze-all IVF
Medroxyprogesterone acetate
Ovarian stimulation
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
27
04
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
pubmed:
23
7
2020
medline:
28
5
2021
entrez:
23
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the effectivity of flexible-start medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) co-treatment ovarian stimulations (OS) with flexible-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) co-treatment OS, in blastocyst freeze-all IVF cycles. This matched cohort study was performed at a single IVF center. Study cycles were extracted from freeze-all IVF cycles performed between February 2015 and June 2018 with cycles grouped according to the co-treatment protocol (MPA and GnRH-ant groups) used. MPA cycles were matched 1:1 using antral follicle count, female age, infertility duration, and female body mass index, with GnRH-ant cycles, resulting in 825 matched cycles. MPA or CET co-treatment was started when leading follicles reached 11-12 mm. Duration of OS was significantly longer, and total FSH dose was significantly higher in the MPA group. Numbers of mature oocytes retrieved were similar; however, the mature oocyte retrieval rate (83.8 vs. 97.1%; p < 0.001), number of blastocysts, blastocyst rate (36.4 vs. 41.4%; p < 0.001) and > 2 viable blastocyst rate were all significantly lower in the MPA group. The live birth (LB) per transfer rates (51.6 vs. 55.7%; p = 0.155) were similar; however, the LB rate per treatment was significantly lower (40.9 vs. 45.8%; p = 0.05). A linear regression included the OS co-treatment protocol (GnRH-ant; 1.4 (1.07-1.81); p = 0.013) in the final model to predict having > 2 viable blastocysts. Flexible-start MPA co-treatment OS was as effective in freeze-all IVF cycles as GnRH-ant co-treatment, with similar LB per transfer rates; however, increased cycle cancellation and reduced blastocyst numbers reduced LB per treatment rates significantly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32696289
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01894-4
pii: 10.1007/s10815-020-01894-4
pmc: PMC7492309
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hormone Antagonists
0
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
C2QI4IOI2G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2337-2345Références
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6
pubmed: 26724797
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13835
pubmed: 30217999
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):685-696
pubmed: 30790147
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Sep 5;15(1):71
pubmed: 28870217
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):379-386.e4
pubmed: 27865446
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):211-220
pubmed: 28062551
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jun;26(6):1270-83
pubmed: 21502182
Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):677-683
pubmed: 31371053
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2939
pubmed: 26945402
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Feb;33(2):207-14
pubmed: 26701802
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1356-1362
pubmed: 27490046
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237
pubmed: 29300975
Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):359-67
pubmed: 15567880
Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880
pubmed: 30927417
Case Rep Med. 2010;2010:367505
pubmed: 20368997
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Oct;33(4):436-448
pubmed: 27527655
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2593-7
pubmed: 21828116
BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055
pubmed: 28276192
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Mar;36(3):269-276
pubmed: 29398416
Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4
pubmed: 19828144
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3
pubmed: 25956370
Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):1055-64
pubmed: 25108462
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):156-162
pubmed: 23040524
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Feb;32(2):171-6
pubmed: 25428436
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):105-11
pubmed: 24161646
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Apr;34(4):345-353
pubmed: 28169189
Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 Dec;159 Suppl 1:S17-25
pubmed: 18849304
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e909
pubmed: 26020402
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012 Mar;13(3):392-7
pubmed: 21657998
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Aug;39(2):321-331
pubmed: 31138494
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7447
pubmed: 28785018