Increase in Central Venous Pressure During Passive Leg Raising Cannot Detect Preload Unresponsiveness.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
23
7
2020
pubmed:
23
7
2020
medline:
20
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
By analogy with the classical central venous pressure rules to assess a fluid challenge, we hypothesized that an increase in central venous pressure greater than or equal to 5 cm H2O (i.e., 4 mm Hg) during passive leg raising can predict preload unresponsiveness diagnosed by the absence of increase in velocity-time integral of the left ventricular outflow tract greater than or equal to 10% during the test (negative passive leg raising test). Velocity-time integral was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Central venous pressure and velocity-time integral were measured before and during passive leg raising. Critically ill patients for whom the physician decided to test preload responsiveness by passive leg raising were prospectively included. Fifty-seven set of measurements were performed in 50 patients. Preload unresponsiveness (negative passive leg raising test) was observed in 32 cases. The changes in central venous pressure during passive leg raising did not differ between positive passive leg raising cases (positive passive leg raising test) and negative passive leg raising test cases (3 ± 2 vs 3 ± 2 mm Hg, respectively) and thus did not predict preload unresponsiveness (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.59). An increase in central venous pressure greater than or equal to 4 mm Hg during passive leg raising was observed in 10 cases of positive passive leg raising test and in 11 cases of negative passive leg raising test. Taking an increase in central venous pressure greater than or equal to 3 or greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg rather than greater than or equal to 4 mm Hg during passive leg raising did not better allow one to identify negative passive leg raising test. Marked increase in central venous pressure during passive leg raising cannot identify negative passive leg raising test cases and thus preload unresponsiveness. Measurements of cardiac output (or its surrogates) during passive leg raising are, thus, mandatory to appropriately interpret this test.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32697509
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004414
pii: 00003246-202008000-00032
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03753672']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e684-e689Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377
Marik PE. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Ann Intensive Care 2014; 4:21
Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, et al. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: An analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:625–632
Sakr Y, Rubatto Birri PN, Kotfis K, et al.; Intensive Care Over Nations Investigators: Higher fluid balance increases the risk of death from sepsis: Results from a large international audit. Crit Care Med 2017; 45:386–394
Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000–2008
Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: An update. Ann Intensive Care 2016; 6:111
Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: It is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8:66
Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1935–1947
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1774–1781
Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A. Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:324–332
Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al.; FENICE Investigators; ESICM Trial Group: Fluid challenges in intensive care: The FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1529–1537
Pinsky MR, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Central venous pressure is a stopping rule, not a target of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Resusc 2014; 16:245–246
De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care 2018; 22:43
Cecconi M, Hernandez G, Dunser M, et al. Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: Narrative review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:21–32
Weil MH, Henning RJ. New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock. Thirteenth annual Becton, Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture. Anesth Analg 1979; 58:124–132
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising: Five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care 2015; 19:18
Magder S. Central venous pressure: A useful but not so simple measurement. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2224–2227
Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1125–1132
Maizel J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, et al. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1133–1138
Girotto V, Teboul JL, Beurton A, et al. Carotid and femoral Doppler do not allow the assessment of passive leg raising effects. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8:67
Beurton A, Teboul JL, Gavelli F, et al. The effects of passive leg raising may be detected by the plethysmographic oxygen saturation signal in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2019; 23:19
Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, et al. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: Importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:85–90
Jozwiak M, Mercado P, Teboul JL, et al. What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocardiography can detect? Crit Care 2019; 23:116
Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, et al. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock? Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:422–428