Reinventing radiation therapy with machine learning and imaging bio-markers (radiomics): State-of-the-art, challenges and perspectives.
Data Science
/ methods
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Machine Learning
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Prognosis
Radiation Oncology
/ methods
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
CT
MR
Machine-learning
PET
Radiation therapy
Radiomics
Journal
Methods (San Diego, Calif.)
ISSN: 1095-9130
Titre abrégé: Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9426302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
02
05
2020
revised:
02
07
2020
accepted:
06
07
2020
pubmed:
23
7
2020
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
23
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radiation therapy is a pivotal cancer treatment that has significantly progressed over the last decade due to numerous technological breakthroughs. Imaging is now playing a critical role on deployment of the clinical workflow, both for treatment planning and treatment delivery. Machine-learning analysis of predefined features extracted from medical images, i.e. radiomics, has emerged as a promising clinical tool for a wide range of clinical problems addressing drug development, clinical diagnosis, treatment selection and implementation as well as prognosis. Radiomics denotes a paradigm shift redefining medical images as a quantitative asset for data-driven precision medicine. The adoption of machine-learning in a clinical setting and in particular of radiomics features requires the selection of robust, representative and clinically interpretable biomarkers that are properly evaluated on a representative clinical data set. To be clinically relevant, radiomics must not only improve patients' management with great accuracy but also be reproducible and generalizable. Hence, this review explores the existing literature and exposes its potential technical caveats, such as the lack of quality control, standardization, sufficient sample size, type of data collection, and external validation. Based upon the analysis of 165 original research studies based on PET, CT-scan, and MRI, this review provides an overview of new concepts, and hypotheses generating findings that should be validated. In particular, it describes evolving research trends to enhance several clinical tasks such as prognostication, treatment planning, response assessment, prediction of recurrence/relapse, and prediction of toxicity. Perspectives regarding the implementation of an AI-based radiotherapy workflow are presented.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32697964
pii: S1046-2023(19)30318-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44-60Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.