Do Magnet®-Designated Hospitals Perform Better on Medicare's Value-Based Purchasing Program?


Journal

The Journal of nursing administration
ISSN: 1539-0721
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Adm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1263116

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 24 7 2020
pubmed: 24 7 2020
medline: 11 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between a hospital's Magnet recognition status, tenure, and its performance in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program. Previous studies have sought to determine associations between quality of care provided in inpatient setting and the Magnet Recognition Program; however, no study has done so using the most recent (FY2017) iteration of the HVBP program, nor determined the influence a hospital's Magnet designation tenure has on HVBP scores. This study used a cross-sectional study design of 2686 hospitals using propensity score matching to reduce bias and improve comparability. Magnet-designated hospitals were associated with higher total performance, process of care and patient experience of care scores, and lower efficiency score. No association was identified between the length of time hospitals have been Magnet designated. Findings suggest non-Magnet status hospitals need to consider implementing the principles of Magnet into their culture or participation in the Magnet Recognition Program to provide higher quality of care.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between a hospital's Magnet recognition status, tenure, and its performance in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous studies have sought to determine associations between quality of care provided in inpatient setting and the Magnet Recognition Program; however, no study has done so using the most recent (FY2017) iteration of the HVBP program, nor determined the influence a hospital's Magnet designation tenure has on HVBP scores.
METHOD METHODS
This study used a cross-sectional study design of 2686 hospitals using propensity score matching to reduce bias and improve comparability.
RESULTS RESULTS
Magnet-designated hospitals were associated with higher total performance, process of care and patient experience of care scores, and lower efficiency score. No association was identified between the length of time hospitals have been Magnet designated.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest non-Magnet status hospitals need to consider implementing the principles of Magnet into their culture or participation in the Magnet Recognition Program to provide higher quality of care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32701644
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000906
pii: 00005110-202007000-00006
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

395-401

Auteurs

Aaron Spaulding (A)

Author Affiliations: Associate Professor (Dr Spaulding), Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic; Associate Professor (Dr Hamadi), Health Administration, University of North Florida; Instructor (Dr Moody), Health Administration, University of North Florida; and Instructor (Ms Lentz), Clinical Document Integrity, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Associate Professor (Dr Liu), Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando; and Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (Dr Wu), Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) Team, Heart/Lung Transplant Department, University of California San Francisco.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH