Protocol of the QUATTRO-II study: a multicenter randomized phase II study comparing CAPOXIRI plus bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Adult
Humans
Adenocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Camptothecin
/ administration & dosage
Colonic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Deoxycytidine
/ administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Genes, ras
Glucuronosyltransferase
/ genetics
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Organoplatinum Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Rectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Bevacizumab
CAPOXIRI
Colorectal cancer
Dose confirmation
FOLFOXIRI
First-line treatment
Multicenter
Progression-free survival
Randomized
Safety
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2020
23 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
accepted:
15
07
2020
entrez:
25
7
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
7
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
First-line treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) is highly effective and regarded as one of the standards-of-care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), despite the high incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea as side effects. AXEPT, an Asian phase III study, showed that modified CAPIRI+BEV [capecitabine (CAP: 1600 mg/m QUATTRO-II is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. In Step 1, the recommended doses of OX and IRI will be investigated as a safety lead-in. In Step 2, patients will be randomized to the recommended dose of either CAPOXIRI+BEV or FOLFOXIRI+BEV. Induction triplet chemotherapy plus BEV treatments will be administered for up to 4 months followed by fluoropyrimidine plus BEV maintenance. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). The similarity in PFS between the two arms will be evaluated by observing whether the point estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for PFS falls between 0.80 and 1.25. Ensuring a 70% probability that the observed HR will be "0.8 < HR < 1.25" under the assumption of the true HR of 1.0, and 100 patients will be evaluated during the 3-year study period. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and patient reported outcome (PRO) (FACT/GOG-Ntx4). Considering the lower incidence of hematologic toxicities with modified CAPIRI+BEV than with FOLFIRI+BEV, CAPOXIRI+BEV may be a promising treatment option if sufficient efficacy and lower hematologic toxicities are indicated in this study. Additionally, a lower incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) reported following CAPEOX treatment compared to that after FOLFOX in ACHIEVE, an adjuvant phase III trial, suggest that CAPOXIRI+BEV can mitigate OX-induced PSN. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04097444 . Registered September 20, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04097444 / Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs041190072. Registered October 9, 2019.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
First-line treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) is highly effective and regarded as one of the standards-of-care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), despite the high incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea as side effects. AXEPT, an Asian phase III study, showed that modified CAPIRI+BEV [capecitabine (CAP: 1600 mg/m
METHODS
METHODS
QUATTRO-II is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. In Step 1, the recommended doses of OX and IRI will be investigated as a safety lead-in. In Step 2, patients will be randomized to the recommended dose of either CAPOXIRI+BEV or FOLFOXIRI+BEV. Induction triplet chemotherapy plus BEV treatments will be administered for up to 4 months followed by fluoropyrimidine plus BEV maintenance. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). The similarity in PFS between the two arms will be evaluated by observing whether the point estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for PFS falls between 0.80 and 1.25. Ensuring a 70% probability that the observed HR will be "0.8 < HR < 1.25" under the assumption of the true HR of 1.0, and 100 patients will be evaluated during the 3-year study period. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and patient reported outcome (PRO) (FACT/GOG-Ntx4).
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the lower incidence of hematologic toxicities with modified CAPIRI+BEV than with FOLFIRI+BEV, CAPOXIRI+BEV may be a promising treatment option if sufficient efficacy and lower hematologic toxicities are indicated in this study. Additionally, a lower incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) reported following CAPEOX treatment compared to that after FOLFOX in ACHIEVE, an adjuvant phase III trial, suggest that CAPOXIRI+BEV can mitigate OX-induced PSN.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04097444 . Registered September 20, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04097444 / Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs041190072. Registered October 9, 2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32703200
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07186-5
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07186-5
pmc: PMC7376863
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Camptothecin
XT3Z54Z28A
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Glucuronosyltransferase
EC 2.4.1.17
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Organoplatinum Compounds
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
UGT1A1 enzyme
EC 2.4.1.-
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04097444']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
687Références
J Clin Invest. 2014 Jan;124(1):72-4
pubmed: 24355918
Invest New Drugs. 2007 Apr;25(2):173-80
pubmed: 16983507
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37
pubmed: 14657227
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jun;24(6):1580-7
pubmed: 23463625
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 12;:
pubmed: 31513248
Anticancer Res. 2010 Jul;30(7):2927-33
pubmed: 20683034
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):660-671
pubmed: 29555258
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Sep;35(9):1343-7
pubmed: 10658525
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):997-1005
pubmed: 24297951
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):57-63
pubmed: 24138831
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 20;24(21):3347-53
pubmed: 16849748
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47
pubmed: 10944126
Lancet. 2000 Mar 25;355(9209):1041-7
pubmed: 10744089
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):23-30
pubmed: 14665611
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Jun;17(2):147-155
pubmed: 29530335
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;75(3):587-94
pubmed: 25577134
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):4866-75
pubmed: 15939922
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Dec 19;2(1):6-12
pubmed: 29863118
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1609-18
pubmed: 25337750
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2013-9
pubmed: 18421054
Oncology. 2010;79(3-4):174-80
pubmed: 21358204