Flow and hydrodynamic shear stress inside a printing needle during biofabrication.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
accepted:
02
07
2020
entrez:
25
7
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We present a simple but accurate algorithm to calculate the flow and shear rate profile of shear thinning fluids, as typically used in biofabrication applications, with an arbitrary viscosity-shear rate relationship in a cylindrical nozzle. By interpolating the viscosity with a set of power-law functions, we obtain a mathematically exact piecewise solution to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation. The algorithm is validated with known solutions for a simplified Carreau-Yasuda fluid, full numerical simulations for a realistic chitosan hydrogel as well as experimental velocity profiles of alginate and chitosan solutions in a microfluidic channel. We implement the algorithm in an easy-to-use Python tool, included as Supplementary Material, to calculate the velocity and shear rate profile during the printing process, depending on the shear thinning behavior of the bioink and printing parameters such as pressure and nozzle size. We confirm that the shear stress varies in an exactly linear fashion, starting from zero at the nozzle center to the maximum shear stress at the wall, independent of the shear thinning properties of the bioink. Finally, we demonstrate how our method can be inverted to obtain rheological bioink parameters in-situ directly before or even during printing from experimentally measured flow rate versus pressure data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32706802
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236371
pii: PONE-D-20-09178
pmc: PMC7380612
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alginates
0
Hydrogels
0
Chitosan
9012-76-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0236371Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 23;8(3):032002
pubmed: 27658612
Chem Rev. 2016 Feb 10;116(3):1496-539
pubmed: 26492834
Biotechnol J. 2009 Aug;4(8):1168-77
pubmed: 19507149
Biofabrication. 2015 Dec 22;7(4):044106
pubmed: 26696405
Biofabrication. 2015 Nov 02;7(4):045002
pubmed: 26523399
Biofabrication. 2009 Dec;1(4):045005
pubmed: 20811114
Biofabrication. 2020 Mar 11;12(2):025022
pubmed: 32050179
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014 Jul;102(5):1063-73
pubmed: 24357498
Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;78:72-8
pubmed: 25847839
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Jul 5;9(26):21959-21970
pubmed: 28598154
BMC Biotechnol. 2015 May 06;15:29
pubmed: 25944125
Adv Mater. 2013 Sep 25;25(36):5011-28
pubmed: 24038336
Adv Mater. 2015 Sep 9;27(34):5075-9
pubmed: 26177925
Biofabrication. 2017 Nov 14;9(4):044107
pubmed: 28930091
Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 16;8(3):035020
pubmed: 27634915
Biomacromolecules. 2015 May 11;16(5):1489-96
pubmed: 25806996
Adv Healthc Mater. 2016 Feb 4;5(3):326-33
pubmed: 26626828
Nanoscale. 2016 Jun 16;8(24):12362-72
pubmed: 27270567