The leaching mechanism of heavy metals (Ni, Cd, As) in a gasification slag during acidification.
Acid treatment
Binding capacity
Calcium
Heavy metal
Solid waste
Journal
Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
11
03
2020
revised:
31
05
2020
accepted:
18
06
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
5
8
2020
entrez:
25
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The gasification slag by acidification can leach abundant heavy metals. In this paper, the fate of heavy metals (Ni, Cd, and As) in the raw slag and the acidified slag that treated by HAc and HCl was systematically investigated combined with Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. The results show that the content of Ni and Cd is reduced with an increasing acid concentration and meets the regulatory standards by 7 M HAc and 3 M HCl, respectively. Most of Ni combined with gehlenite is released as gehlenite dissolves during acid treatment, whereas Cd in combination with gehlenite and iron compounds is hard to release at lower HAc concentrations. Unexpectedly, the content of As tends to elevate at a higher concentration of HAc, which is due to the increase in the content of Ca by new Ca-compound formation and the higher binding capacity of Ca to As according to DFT results. Additionally, if the acid-base ratio reaches about 2.0 by acid treatment, there would be a maximum leaching rate. It is recommended that acid concentration should be controlled to avoid a secondary risk of heavy metals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32707442
pii: S0956-053X(20)30339-1
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.029
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Iron Compounds
0
Metals, Heavy
0
Cadmium
00BH33GNGH
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17-24Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.