Use of translational modeling and simulation for quantitative comparison of PF-06804103, a new generation HER2 ADC, with Trastuzumab-DM1.
Administration, Intravenous
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
/ administration & dosage
Animals
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Cell Line, Tumor
Computer Simulation
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Immunoconjugates
/ administration & dosage
Macaca fascicularis
Male
Mice
Models, Biological
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Antibody drug conjugate
HER2
Oncology
PK/PD
Pharmacokinetics
Translational modeling
Tumor static concentration
Journal
Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
ISSN: 1573-8744
Titre abrégé: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101096520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
13
12
2019
accepted:
07
07
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A modeling and simulation approach was used for quantitative comparison of a new generation HER2 antibody drug conjugate (ADC, PF-06804103) with trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1). To compare preclinical efficacy, the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of PF-06804103 and T-DM1 was determined across a range of mouse tumor xenograft models, using a tumor growth inhibition model. The tumor static concentration was assigned as the minimal efficacious concentration. PF-06804103 was concluded to be more potent than T-DM1 across cell lines studied. TSCs ranged from 1.0 to 9.8 µg/mL (n = 7) for PF-06804103 and from 4.7 to 29 µg/mL (n = 5) for T-DM1. Two experimental models which were resistant to T-DM1, responded to PF-06804103 treatment. A mechanism-based target mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model was used to predict the human PK of PF-06804103. This model was constructed and validated based on T-DM1 which has non-linear PK at doses administered in the clinic, driven by binding to shed HER2. Non-linear PK is predicted for PF-06804103 in the clinic and is dependent upon circulating HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) concentrations. The models were translated to human and suggested greater efficacy for PF-06804103 compared to T-DM1. In conclusion, a fit-for-purpose translational PK/PD strategy for ADCs is presented and used to compare a new generation HER2 ADC with T-DM1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32710210
doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09702-3
pii: 10.1007/s10928-020-09702-3
pmc: PMC7520420
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Immunoconjugates
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
SE2KH7T06F
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
513-526Références
AAPS J. 2016 Sep;18(5):1101-1116
pubmed: 27198897
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014 Mar;27:54-60
pubmed: 24718321
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):92-8
pubmed: 19933921
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2033-2041
pubmed: 30442682
Biochem Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 1;87(1):150-61
pubmed: 23817077
Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;66(8):4426-33
pubmed: 16618769
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 05;16(2):209
pubmed: 24887180
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 1;9(12):4423-34
pubmed: 14555515
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001 Dec;28(6):507-32
pubmed: 11999290
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2010 Jun;37(3):221-42
pubmed: 20424896
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):640-653
pubmed: 28343975
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;6(2):87-109
pubmed: 27884052
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177-82
pubmed: 3798106
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):952-63
pubmed: 25646013
Eur J Cancer. 2004 Apr;40(6):827-36
pubmed: 15120038
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012 Dec;39(6):643-59
pubmed: 23151991
Ann Oncol. 2001;12 Suppl 1:S49-55
pubmed: 11521722
J Med Chem. 2014 Aug 28;57(16):6949-64
pubmed: 24967516
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 May;93(5):379-81
pubmed: 23598453
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Jul;17(7):1441-1453
pubmed: 29695635
MAbs. 2018 Jul;10(5):751-764
pubmed: 29634430
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):141-148
pubmed: 28056202
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 22;6(4):e17887
pubmed: 21526167
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 1;15(23):7381-8
pubmed: 19920100
Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 1;64(3):1094-101
pubmed: 14871843
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013 Oct;40(5):557-71
pubmed: 23933716
J Med Chem. 2014 Dec 26;57(24):10527-43
pubmed: 25431858
Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):R75
pubmed: 17976236
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Apr 7;53(15):3796-827
pubmed: 24677743
Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(5):603-612
pubmed: 31839676
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 May;69(5):1229-40
pubmed: 22271209
Drug Discov Today. 2007 Dec;12(23-24):1018-24
pubmed: 18061880
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014 Sep;6(5):202-9
pubmed: 25342987
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Apr 14;17(4):561
pubmed: 27089329
AAPS J. 2014 Sep;16(5):994-1008
pubmed: 24917179
Cancer Invest. 2001;19(1):49-56
pubmed: 11291556
Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;2(4 Suppl 1):S134-9
pubmed: 14508091
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):398-405
pubmed: 21172893
Cancer. 2008 Sep 15;113(6):1294-301
pubmed: 18661530
Br J Cancer. 2017 Dec 5;117(12):1736-1742
pubmed: 29065110