Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute.
Blood Loss, Surgical
/ statistics & numerical data
Endometrial Neoplasms
/ surgery
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
/ adverse effects
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Safety
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Fistula
/ etiology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ surgery
Vaginal Fistula
/ etiology
Cervical cancer
Pune technique
Radical hysterectomy
Robotic surgery
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
23
04
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The main objective of this study was to assess in a series of 30 patients, the feasibility, oncological safety and efficacy of radical hysterectomy by a new robotic system. Prospective study design. Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute and Multispeciality Hospital. We performed Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in patients from August 2019 through February 2020. All the surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Puntambekar S). Since August 2019, 30 patients with early cervical cancer/endometrial cancer were selected for radical hysterectomy. All patients were in good general condition with controlled medical comorbidities. The mean operative time was 104 min, with mean total lymph node yield of 24.7. The average blood loss was 60 ml and the hospital stay was 2.1 days, and majority of the patients were catheter free by 1 week. Two patients developed uretero-vaginal fistula on the 8th day of surgery. One was managed with Double J stenting and in the other we did laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. Our study has demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RRH by the Versius robotic systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32710253
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x
pii: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451-456Références
Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE (1992) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(3):864–865
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91351-A
Nezhat C (1993) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection? Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1644–1645
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90819-9
Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:852061
doi: 10.1155/2011/852061
Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW et al (2017) Science direct. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017:1–9
Magrina JF (2007) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 28:77–82
pubmed: 17479665
Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR et al (2015) Cervical cancer, version 22015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 13:395–404
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0055
Puntambekar et al (2007) Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol 14:682–689
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.007
Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM (2008) Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol. 111:425–430
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.016
Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170(5):1738–1741
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092881.24608.5e
Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, Al-Khaduri M, Kew F, Lopes AD (2012) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochr Database Syst Rev 9:006655
Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS et al (2012) Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynaecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J clin oncol 30(7):695–700
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645
Jorgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu CS, Korsholm M, Lund K, Jensen PT (2019) Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J cancer 109:1–11
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.004
Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, Giannakopoulos NV, Veljovich D, Paley P (2017) Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 28(6):e82
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82
Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, Jackson AL, Stavitzski NM, Dahl AA et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(4):513–522
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014
Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP (2014) Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 121(12):1538–1545
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12822
Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez KL et al (2016) Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol 25(1):66–71
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.004
Segaert A, Traen K, Van Trappen P, Peeters F, Leunen K, Goffin F et al (2015) Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in cervicalcarcinoma: the Belgian experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(9):1690–1696
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000536
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395
Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1905–1914
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923
Nie J-C, Yan A-Q, Liu X-S (2017) Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy results in better surgical outcomes compared with the traditional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27:1990–1999
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001101
Puntambekar et al (2010) Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique. J Robotic Surg 4:259–264
doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0224-9