X-ray-free ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study with historical control.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Supine
Ultrasound-guided
X-ray-free
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the outcomes and complications of supine X-ray-free ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (XG-PCNL) with fluoroscopy-guided (FG)-PCNL in both prone and supine positions. This was a comparative study that included a prospective cohort and historical control groups. This study analysed 40 consecutive patients who undergone supine XG-PCNL between October 2019 and March 2020. The control groups were composed of historical control formed from the last 40 consecutive patients who underwent FG-PCNL in both supine and prone positions from our PCNL database from January 2018 and September 2019. Patients' demographics, stone characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. A total of 120 patients were classified into the supine XG-PCNL, supine FG-PCNL, and prone FG-PCNL groups (each N = 40). They had similar baseline characteristics and initial stone burden. The supine XG-PCNL group had higher puncture attempts, nephrostomy tube placement, and longer surgery duration than both the supine and prone FG-PCNL groups. However, the stone-free rate was similar in all groups (85%, supine XG-PCNL; 72.5%, supine FG-PCNL; 77.5% prone FG-PCNL; p = 0.39). No significant difference was found in the complication rate and length of stay among the three groups. Supine XG-PCNL is an alternative to both supine and prone FG-PCNL with similar efficacy and complication rates for kidney stone patients. This could be a good alternative to urological centres with no access to fluoroscopy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32710296
doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02577-w
pii: 10.1007/s11255-020-02577-w
pmc: PMC7655569
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2253-2259Subventions
Organisme : Universitas Indonesia
ID : NKB-1526/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020
Références
Electron Physician. 2015 Nov 20;7(7):1511-4
pubmed: 26767106
J Endourol. 2010 Sep;24(9):1421-6
pubmed: 20687858
Urol J. 2019 Aug 17;17(5):456-461
pubmed: 31422576
J Endourol. 2011 Apr;25(4):593-6
pubmed: 21395489
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(51):e9232
pubmed: 29390476
Urolithiasis. 2015 Apr;43(2):189-95
pubmed: 25655249
F1000Res. 2020 Apr 2;9:231
pubmed: 33014345
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60
pubmed: 27238616
Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):477-81
pubmed: 26135811
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101(5):599-602
pubmed: 18257858
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):281-4
pubmed: 18294034
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1346-9
pubmed: 21251187
World J Urol. 2010 Apr;28(2):239-44
pubmed: 19641923
J Endourol. 2011 Feb;25(2):327-33
pubmed: 21214412
Urology. 2017 May;103:52-58
pubmed: 28024969
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):346-352
pubmed: 28868506
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82
pubmed: 26344917
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar 15;44(6):386-8
pubmed: 16638348
World J Urol. 2019 May;37(5):777-788
pubmed: 30244337
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):233-6
pubmed: 17552975
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):710-6
pubmed: 27564281
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):268-73
pubmed: 27437536