Skin Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Field-In-Field Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Helical Inverse Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 10 02 2020
revised: 08 06 2020
accepted: 03 07 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 27 7 2021
entrez: 27 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin toxicity is a common adverse effect of breast radiotherapy. We investigated whether inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) would reduce the incidence of skin toxicity compared with forward field-in-field breast IMRT (FiF-IMRT) in early stage breast cancer. This phase III randomised controlled trial compared whole-breast irradiation with either FiF-IMRT or helical tomotherapy IMRT (HT-IMRT), with skin toxicity as the primary end point. Patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions and were assessed to compare skin toxicity between treatment arms. In total, 177 patients were available for assessment and the median follow-up was 73.1 months. Inverse IMRT achieved more homogeneous coverage than FiF-IMRT; erythema and moist desquamation were higher with FiF-IMRT compared with HT-IMRT (61% versus 34%; P < 0.001; 33% versus 11%; P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed large breast volume, FiF-IMRT and chemotherapy were independent factors associated with worse acute toxicity. There was no difference between treatment arms in the incidence of late toxicities. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 96.3% for both FiF-IMRT and HT-IMRT and the 5-year overall survival was 96.3% for FiF-IMRT and 97.4% for HT-IMRT. Our study showed significant reduction in acute skin toxicity using HT-IMRT compared with FiF-IMRT, without significant reduction in late skin toxicities. On the basis of these findings, inverse-planned IMRT could be used in routine practice for whole-breast irradiation with careful plan optimisation to achieve the required dose constraints for organs at risk.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32711920
pii: S0936-6555(20)30287-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30-39

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

K Joseph (K)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

L J Vos (LJ)

Alberta Cancer Clinical Trials, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Z Gabos (Z)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

N Pervez (N)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

S Chafe (S)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

K Tankel (K)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

H Warkentin (H)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

S Ghosh (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

J Amanie (J)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

K Powell (K)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

L-A Polkosnik (LA)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

S Horsman (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

M MacKenzie (M)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

S Sabri (S)

Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

M B Parliament (MB)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

J Mackey (J)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

B Abdulkarim (B)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: bassam.abdulkarim@mcgill.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH