Behavioural validation of a parent-report measure of child food fussiness.


Journal

Appetite
ISSN: 1095-8304
Titre abrégé: Appetite
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2020
Historique:
received: 03 01 2020
revised: 26 06 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 27 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Food fussiness is the rejection of familiar and novel foods leading to consumption that is insufficient and/or inadequately varied. Its importance to children's nutrition and the development of food preferences means it has been the focus of extensive research. To measure food fussiness, research has predominantly relied on parent-report, though parents' reporting of their child's eating behaviour can be reliable, responses may also be subject to bias. Utilising data from video-recordings of sixty-seven mother-child dyads during a meal in the home environment, this study aimed to validate the most widely used parent-report questionnaire measuring food fussiness against independent observations of children's eating behaviour and, in so doing, determine its accuracy. Maternal reported food fussiness, assessed using the Food Fussiness subscale of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ; Wardle, Guthrie, Sanderson, & Rapoport, 2001) was compared to children's observed food rejection and acceptance behaviours. Bootstrapped Pearson's correlations revealed that maternal reports of food fussiness were significantly positively related to food rejection behaviours and significantly negatively related to food acceptance behaviours. Maternal reports of food fussiness were also found to be significantly negatively related to the proportion of familiar/appealing of familiar foods consumed by the child. There was no significant association between maternal reported food fussiness and the proportion of familiar/unappealing, unfamiliar/appealing and unfamiliar/unappealing foods consumed by the child or the meal duration. These findings support the CEBQ FF as a valid measure of food fussiness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32712195
pii: S0195-6663(20)30004-0
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104796
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104796

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Stella Rendall (S)

School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.

Helen Dodd (H)

School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.

Kate Harvey (K)

School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK. Electronic address: k.n.harvey@reading.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH