Clinical Differences of Recent Myocardial Infarction Compared With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Insights From the Tokyo CCU Network Multicenter Registry.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chest Pain
/ epidemiology
Comorbidity
Coronary Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ methods
Diabetes Mellitus
/ epidemiology
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Admission
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Shock, Cardiogenic
/ drug therapy
Tokyo
/ epidemiology
Treatment Outcome
Acute myocardial infarction
Epidemiology
Mechanical complication
Recent myocardial infarction
Journal
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society
ISSN: 1347-4820
Titre abrégé: Circ J
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101137683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 08 2020
25 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
14
10
2021
entrez:
28
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients have been studied; however, those of recent myocardial infarction (RMI) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify characteristics, treatment strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of RMI patients in the Tokyo CCU network database.Methods and Results:In total, 1,853 RMI and 12,494 AMI patients from the Tokyo CCU network database during 2013-2016 were compared. Both RMI and AMI were redefined by onset times of 2-28 days and ≤24 h, respectively. The RMI group had a higher average age (70.4±12.9 vs. 68.0±13.4 years, P<0.001), more women (27.6% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), lower proportion of patients with chest pain as the chief complaint (75.2% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35.9% vs. 31.0%, P<0.001), and higher mechanical complication incidence (3.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001) than did the AMI group. Thirty-day mortality was comparable (5.3% vs. 5.8%, P=0.360); major causes of death were cardiogenic shock and mechanical complications in the AMI and RMI groups, respectively. Death from mechanical complications (not onset time) in the AMI group plateaued almost 1 week after hospitalization, whereas it continued to increase in the RMI group. Both RMI and AMI patients have distinctive clinical features, sequelae, and causes of death. Although treatment of RMI patients adhered to guidelines, it was insufficient, and death from mechanical complications continues to increase.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients have been studied; however, those of recent myocardial infarction (RMI) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify characteristics, treatment strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of RMI patients in the Tokyo CCU network database.Methods and Results:In total, 1,853 RMI and 12,494 AMI patients from the Tokyo CCU network database during 2013-2016 were compared. Both RMI and AMI were redefined by onset times of 2-28 days and ≤24 h, respectively. The RMI group had a higher average age (70.4±12.9 vs. 68.0±13.4 years, P<0.001), more women (27.6% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), lower proportion of patients with chest pain as the chief complaint (75.2% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35.9% vs. 31.0%, P<0.001), and higher mechanical complication incidence (3.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001) than did the AMI group. Thirty-day mortality was comparable (5.3% vs. 5.8%, P=0.360); major causes of death were cardiogenic shock and mechanical complications in the AMI and RMI groups, respectively. Death from mechanical complications (not onset time) in the AMI group plateaued almost 1 week after hospitalization, whereas it continued to increase in the RMI group.
CONCLUSIONS
Both RMI and AMI patients have distinctive clinical features, sequelae, and causes of death. Although treatment of RMI patients adhered to guidelines, it was insufficient, and death from mechanical complications continues to increase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32713883
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0333
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM