Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: A meta-analysis.

Adsorption Biochar Contaminant Functional group Polarity Pyrolysis

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
revised: 01 07 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 17 9 2020
entrez: 28 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biochar is a porous, amorphous, stable, and low-density carbon material derived from the carbonization of various biological residues. Biochars have multifunctional properties that make them promising adsorbents for the remediation of organic and inorganic contaminants from soil and water. High temperature treatment (HTT) and the properties of feedstocks are key factors influencing the properties of biochars. Feedstocks have distinctive physicochemical properties due to variations in elemental and structural composition, and they respond heterogeneously to specific pyrolysis conditions. The criteria for the selection of feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions for designing biochars for specific sorption properties are inadequately understood. We evaluated the influence of pyrolysis temperature on a wide range of feedstocks to investigate their effects on biochar properties. With increasing HTT, biochar pH, surface area, pore size, ash content, hydrophobicity and O/C vs. H/C (ratios that denote stability) increased, whereas, hydrophilicity, yield of biochar, O/C, and H/C decreased. Discriminant analysis of data from 533 published datasets revealed that biochar derived from hardwood (HBC) and softwood generally have greater surface area and carbon content, but lower content of oxygen and mineral constituents, than manure- (MBC) and grass-derived biochars (GBC). GBC and MBC have abundant oxygen-containing functional groups than SBC and HBC. The sequence of stability and aromaticity of feedstocks was MBC < GBC < SBC < HBC. Therefore, SBC and HBC are suitable for sorption of hydrophobic molecules. Biochars produced from low HTT are suitable for removal of ionic contaminants, whereas those produced at high HTT are suitable for removal of organic contaminants. The influences of biochar properties on sorption performance of heavy metals and organic contaminants are critically reviewed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32717463
pii: S0048-9697(20)34236-4
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140714
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Manure 0
biochar 0
Charcoal 16291-96-6

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

140714

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Masud Hassan (M)

Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Electronic address: Masud.Hassan@uon.edu.au.

Yanju Liu (Y)

Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Electronic address: Yanju.liu@newcastle.edu.au.

Ravi Naidu (R)

Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Electronic address: Ravi.naidu@newcastle.edu.au.

Sanjai J Parikh (SJ)

Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: sjparikh@ucdavis.edu.

Jianhua Du (J)

Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Electronic address: Jianhua.du@newcastle.edu.au.

Fangjie Qi (F)

Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Electronic address: Fangjie.qi@newcastle.edu.au.

Ian R Willett (IR)

School of Agriculture & Food, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia. Electronic address: ian.willett@unimelb.edu.au.

Articles similaires

Calcium Carbonate Sand Powders Construction Materials Materials Testing
Soil Charcoal Nutrients Manure Nitrogen
Charcoal Soil Microbiology Soil Biomass Carbon

Classifications MeSH