Transcriptome analysis of the uterus of hens laying eggs differing in cuticle deposition.
Chicken
Cuticle
Egg
Next generation sequencing
Oviduct
Oviposition
Transcriptome
Uterus
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2020
27 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
20
01
2020
accepted:
06
07
2020
entrez:
29
7
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Avian eggs have a proteinaceous cuticle. The quantity of cuticle varies and the deposition of a good cuticle in the uterus (Shell-gland) prevents transmission of bacteria to the egg contents. To understand cuticle deposition, uterus transcriptomes were compared between hens with i) naturally good and poor cuticle and, ii) where manipulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal-oviduct axis produced eggs with or without cuticle. The highest expressed genes encoded eggshell matrix and cuticle proteins, e.g. MEPE (OC-116), BPIFB3 (OVX-36), RARRES1 (OVX-32), WAP (OVX-25), and genes for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, active transport and energy metabolism. Expression of a number of these genes differed between hens laying eggs with or without cuticle. There was also a high expression of clock genes. PER2, CRY2, CRY1, CLOCK and BMAL1 were differentially expressed when cuticle deposition was prevented, and they also changed throughout the egg formation cycle. This suggests an endogenous clock in the uterus may be a component of cuticle deposition control. Cuticle proteins are glycosylated and glycosaminoglycan binding genes had a lower expression when cuticle proteins were deposited on the egg. The immediate early genes, JUN and FOS, were expressed less when the cuticle had not been deposited and changed over the egg formation cycle, suggesting they are important in oviposition and cuticle deposition. The uterus transcriptome of hens with good and poor cuticle deposition did not differ. We have gained insights into the factors that can affect the production of the cuticle especially clock genes and immediate early genes. We have demonstrated that these genes change their expression over the period of eggshell formation supporting their importance. The lack of differences in expression between the uterus of hens laying eggs with the best and worse cuticle suggest the genetic basis of the trait may lie outside the oviduct.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Avian eggs have a proteinaceous cuticle. The quantity of cuticle varies and the deposition of a good cuticle in the uterus (Shell-gland) prevents transmission of bacteria to the egg contents.
RESULTS
RESULTS
To understand cuticle deposition, uterus transcriptomes were compared between hens with i) naturally good and poor cuticle and, ii) where manipulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal-oviduct axis produced eggs with or without cuticle. The highest expressed genes encoded eggshell matrix and cuticle proteins, e.g. MEPE (OC-116), BPIFB3 (OVX-36), RARRES1 (OVX-32), WAP (OVX-25), and genes for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, active transport and energy metabolism. Expression of a number of these genes differed between hens laying eggs with or without cuticle. There was also a high expression of clock genes. PER2, CRY2, CRY1, CLOCK and BMAL1 were differentially expressed when cuticle deposition was prevented, and they also changed throughout the egg formation cycle. This suggests an endogenous clock in the uterus may be a component of cuticle deposition control. Cuticle proteins are glycosylated and glycosaminoglycan binding genes had a lower expression when cuticle proteins were deposited on the egg. The immediate early genes, JUN and FOS, were expressed less when the cuticle had not been deposited and changed over the egg formation cycle, suggesting they are important in oviposition and cuticle deposition. The uterus transcriptome of hens with good and poor cuticle deposition did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We have gained insights into the factors that can affect the production of the cuticle especially clock genes and immediate early genes. We have demonstrated that these genes change their expression over the period of eggshell formation supporting their importance. The lack of differences in expression between the uterus of hens laying eggs with the best and worse cuticle suggest the genetic basis of the trait may lie outside the oviduct.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32718314
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06882-7
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-06882-7
pmc: PMC7385972
doi:
Substances chimiques
BPIFB3 protein, human
0
Carrier Proteins
0
Membrane Proteins
0
RARRES1 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
516Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20211550
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20211553
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/K006096/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/K0070921/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20211552
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20320000
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/05191132
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
pubmed: 10547847
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013 Jun 15;304(12):R1053-64
pubmed: 23576606
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
Endocrinology. 1992 Jun;130(6):3223-30
pubmed: 1375896
Respir Res. 2017 Apr 20;18(1):65
pubmed: 28427395
Nat Protoc. 2013 Sep;8(9):1765-86
pubmed: 23975260
BMC Genomics. 2014 Mar 21;15:220
pubmed: 24649854
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 May;397(1):205-214
pubmed: 19998026
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13
pubmed: 19033363
Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36
pubmed: 23618408
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836):
pubmed: 27488648
Electrophoresis. 2003 Mar;24(5):843-52
pubmed: 12627446
Biol Reprod. 2011 Aug;85(2):306-14
pubmed: 21543768
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Endocrinology. 1993 Nov;133(5):2049-54
pubmed: 8404652
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009 Apr;152(4):447-69
pubmed: 19118637
FEBS Lett. 1997 Oct 27;416(3):329-34
pubmed: 9373179
Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Oct 15;15 Spec No 2:R271-7
pubmed: 16987893
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2018 Jan 1;255:64-70
pubmed: 29061367
J Endocrinol. 1975 Oct;67(1):59-70
pubmed: 1194828
J Biol Chem. 2001 Oct 19;276(42):39243-52
pubmed: 11493603
Cell Tissue Res. 2014 Jul;357(1):363-72
pubmed: 24744268
Br Poult Sci. 2008 Mar;49(2):133-43
pubmed: 18409087
Br Poult Sci. 1993 Sep;34(4):655-62
pubmed: 8242405
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):89
pubmed: 30683053
Endocrinology. 1990 Nov;127(5):2595-7
pubmed: 2121466
Biol Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;97(1):39-49
pubmed: 28859284
J Cell Sci. 2004 Dec 1;117(Pt 25):5965-73
pubmed: 15564374
Poult Sci. 2019 Feb 1;98(2):940-948
pubmed: 30137530
J Proteomics. 2012 May 17;75(9):2697-706
pubmed: 22708129
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Feb 24;52(1):13
pubmed: 32093603
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
BMC Mol Biol. 2008 Apr 22;9:41
pubmed: 18430226
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009 Sep 1;163(1-2):225-32
pubmed: 19303879
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jun 4;51(1):25
pubmed: 31164080
Proteomics. 2006 Jul;6(13):3801-10
pubmed: 16767793
Poult Sci. 2016 Jul 1;95(7):1653-1659
pubmed: 26944979
Endocrinology. 2011 Oct;152(10):3952-62
pubmed: 21810949
BMC Immunol. 2010 Mar 12;11:12
pubmed: 20226050
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Nov;16(9):414-9
pubmed: 16202618
Poult Sci. 2019 Apr 1;98(4):1775-1784
pubmed: 30476345
Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Jul;20(13):4626-34
pubmed: 10848589
Anim Genet. 2013 Dec;44(6):661-8
pubmed: 23837723
Genes Cells. 2018 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 29920869
Biol Open. 2015 May 11;4(7):753-9
pubmed: 25964661
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2017 Sep/Oct;90(5):588-599
pubmed: 28745930
Biophys J. 2006 Oct 1;91(7):2601-8
pubmed: 16861275
Genomics. 2020 Jan;112(1):243-251
pubmed: 30772430
Matrix Biol. 1995 Dec;14(9):765-71
pubmed: 8785591