The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer.
Breast cancer
CDK4/6
Capecitabine
Chemotherapy
Endocrine resistant
mTOR
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
27
02
2020
accepted:
06
07
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
29
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) and targeted therapy (CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors) are standard of care for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). When ET is not effective, chemotherapy is commonly used. However, clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in the endocrine-resistant setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors and the compare efficacies of chemotherapy agents in endocrine-resistant MBC. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received chemotherapy after progression on ET with or without targeted therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1999 to 2017. We collected baseline clinicopathological and all treatment data. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) of first-line chemotherapy for MBC. For the 1258 patients analyzed, mean age was 55.3 years (range 21-91). Previous treatment with targeted therapy was recorded for 390 patients (31%): 264 with CDK4/6 inhibitor, 205 with mTOR inhibitor, and 79 treated with both. The most frequent chemotherapy agents were capecitabine (48.9%) and taxanes (28.6%). After adjustment for all factors in a multivariate model, previous treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor had the strongest negative effect on TTF regardless of ET duration (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95%CI 1.49-2.27; p < 0.001). Conversely, capecitabine had significantly longer median TTF than taxanes regardless of whether patients had prior exposure to taxanes in primary setting (6.1 vs 4.9 months; HR 0.64; 95%CI 0.55-0.75; p < 0.001). Previous exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitor had a negative predictive effect for the efficacy of chemotherapy. Capecitabine had the best efficacy against endocrine-resistant breast cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32720114
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05837-6
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05837-6
pmc: PMC7501162
mid: NIHMS1615503
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hormones
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
729-739Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003167
Pays : United States
Références
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(1):63-72
pubmed: 27798749
Oncologist. 2008;13 Suppl 2:19-21
pubmed: 18434634
Ann Oncol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1247-54
pubmed: 11697835
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54
pubmed: 22766518
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936
pubmed: 30345905
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):307-316
pubmed: 31166679
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72
pubmed: 20586616
BMC Med. 2015 Dec 18;13:303
pubmed: 26684470
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103
pubmed: 27217461
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439
pubmed: 26947331
Lancet. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1134-1150
pubmed: 27865536
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884
pubmed: 28580882
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 23;9(1):1595
pubmed: 29686231
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4498-504
pubmed: 22025143
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1634-1657
pubmed: 30032243
Br J Cancer. 2002 May 6;86(9):1367-72
pubmed: 11986765
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):520-9
pubmed: 22149876
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 29;:
pubmed: 31563959