Screening of postpartum depression among new mothers in Istanbul: a psychometric evaluation of the Turkish Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Reliability
Turkey
Validation
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jul 2020
28 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
06
05
2020
accepted:
02
07
2020
entrez:
30
7
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study is the first concerted effort to ascertain factor structure of EPDS using evidence based analytical techniques. It is the most widely used scale for assessing postpartum depression in Turkey, and yet no investigations have been conducted to assess it factor structure. This study was conducted from April 2012 to April 2018 at the Marmara University Hospital operating under the name of Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital in Istanbul Turkey. A total of 1700 women were included in this study, who responded to the EPDS, in addition to demographic characteristics and well-being of their offspring. A total of 1615 mothers provided adequate data for inclusion in analysis. Standardized Chronbach's alpha for EPDS was 0.81 with corrected item-total correlations ranging from 0.35 to 0.62. Parallel analysis, MAP Velicer Test and Hull's method dictated retaining of one factor structure. All the items revealed adequate communalities (> 0.20) except item 2 (enjoyment) and item 10 (self-harm). Their communalities were 0.16 and 0.19, however, these items were not dropped. All of the items yielded moderate to strong factor loadings. Minimum factor loading was for item 2 (0.40) and highest for item 8 (0.71).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32723389
doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05196-x
pii: 10.1186/s13104-020-05196-x
pmc: PMC7390134
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
355Références
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:142-146
pubmed: 29879609
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2018 Sep;46(5):174-82
pubmed: 30338774
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Mar;89(1):235-247
pubmed: 28815479
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):139G-149G
pubmed: 22423165
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Jan;21(1):9-20
pubmed: 27520555
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jul 21;14:185
pubmed: 25047367
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):88-91
pubmed: 16817517
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412
pubmed: 24844115
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 20;5(10):e009742
pubmed: 26486977
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;39(6):483-6
pubmed: 15205733
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Jul;39(7):821-841
pubmed: 29693507
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):153-69
pubmed: 17761026
Int J Public Health. 2010 Dec;55(6):543-9
pubmed: 20725761
J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103
pubmed: 12584072
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Aug;31(4):420-428
pubmed: 28693880
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):511-21
pubmed: 24183474
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 5;8(1):17659
pubmed: 30518774
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 May;119(5):350-64
pubmed: 19298573
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:234-243
pubmed: 28167438
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Sep;62(6):524-529
pubmed: 27849229
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1201-7
pubmed: 12540723
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):1986-2001
pubmed: 25818179
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e82521
pubmed: 24340036