The effects of N-acetylcysteine on inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Acetylcysteine
/ pharmacology
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
/ pharmacology
Antioxidants
/ pharmacology
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cytokines
/ blood
Female
Humans
Inflammation
/ blood
Inflammation Mediators
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Oxidative Stress
/ drug effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Young Adult
Inflammation
Meta-analysis
N-Acetylcysteine
Oxidative stress
Systematic review
Journal
European journal of pharmacology
ISSN: 1879-0712
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1254354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2020
05 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
25
04
2020
revised:
08
07
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
19
5
2021
entrez:
30
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prolonged inflammation could be considered as the leading cause of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disorders, type two diabetes, and obesity. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is considered an antioxidant. The present meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of NAC in alleviating inflammation and oxidative stress. PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Embase databases and Google Scholar were searched up to Nov 2019. Random effect analysis was used to perform meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were carried out to find heterogeneity sources. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore linear relationship between effect size and variables. Trim and fill analysis were performed in case of the presence of publication bias. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A total of 28 studies were included in meta-analysis. NAC significantly decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD = -1.44 μmol/L; 95% CI: -2.05, -0.84; P < 0.001), IL-8 (WMD = -2.56 pg/ml; 95% CI: -3.89, -1.23; P < 0.001) and homocysteine (WMD = -1.45 pg/ml; 95% CI: -2.74, -0.17; P = 0.027) levels. There were no significant effects of NAC supplementation on CRP (SMD = -0.1 g/L; 95% CI: -0.52, 0.32; P = 0.647), TNF- α (WMD = -0.2 pg/ml; 95% CI: -0.65, 0.25; P = 0.378) and IL-6 (WMD = -0.41 pg/ml; 95% CI: -1.15, 0.32; P = 0.270) levels. However, NAC effects were significant in ameliorating TNF-α and IL-6 using sensitivity analysis. NAC significantly decreased MDA, IL-8, and homocysteine levels. The effects of NAC on amending TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significant after sensitivity analysis. No significant change was observed on CRP levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32726657
pii: S0014-2999(20)30460-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173368
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
0
Antioxidants
0
Biomarkers
0
Cytokines
0
Inflammation Mediators
0
Acetylcysteine
WYQ7N0BPYC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173368Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.