Energetics and kinetics of substrate analog-coupled staphylococcal nuclease folding revealed by a statistical mechanical approach.
protein binding
protein folding
real-time NMR
staphylococcal nuclease
statistical mechanical model
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 08 2020
18 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Protein conformational changes associated with ligand binding, especially those involving intrinsically disordered proteins, are mediated by tightly coupled intra- and intermolecular events. Such reactions are often discussed in terms of two limiting kinetic mechanisms, conformational selection (CS), where folding precedes binding, and induced fit (IF), where binding precedes folding. It has been shown that coupled folding/binding reactions can proceed along both CS and IF pathways with the flux ratio depending on conditions such as ligand concentration. However, the structural and energetic basis of such complex reactions remains poorly understood. Therefore, we used experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches to explore structural and energetic aspects of the coupled-folding/binding reaction of staphylococcal nuclease in the presence of the substrate analog adenosine-3',5'-diphosphate. Optically monitored equilibrium and kinetic data, combined with a statistical mechanical model, gave deeper insight into the relative importance of specific and Coulombic protein-ligand interactions in governing the reaction mechanism. We also investigated structural aspects of the reaction at the residue level using NMR and all-atom replica-permutation molecular dynamics simulations. Both approaches yielded clear evidence for accumulation of a transient protein-ligand encounter complex early in the reaction under IF-dominant conditions. Quantitative analysis of the equilibrium/kinetic folding revealed that the ligand-dependent CS-to-IF shift resulted from stabilization of the compact transition state primarily by weakly ligand-dependent Coulombic interactions with smaller contributions from specific binding energies. At a more macroscopic level, the CS-to-IF shift was represented as a displacement of the reaction "route" on the free energy surface, which was consistent with a flux analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32737158
pii: 1914349117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914349117
pmc: PMC7443883
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Ligands
0
Deoxyribonucleases
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19953-19962Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006927
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM116911
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Chem Rev. 2009 Mar 11;109(3):839-60
pubmed: 19196002
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10197-202
pubmed: 24982141
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Sep 16;12(9):e1005067
pubmed: 27636092
J Mol Biol. 2004 Apr 23;338(2):383-400
pubmed: 15066439
Biochemistry. 1989 Jun 27;28(13):5509-24
pubmed: 2673349
J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 28;248(2):478-86
pubmed: 7739054
Biophys Chem. 2014 Feb;186:13-21
pubmed: 24113284
J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):321-31
pubmed: 10550212
Proteins. 1989;5(3):183-201
pubmed: 2780539
Protein Sci. 2013 Oct;22(10):1336-48
pubmed: 23904284
Proteins. 2012 Oct;80(10):2397-416
pubmed: 22641605
Biochemistry. 1997 May 13;36(19):5795-805
pubmed: 9153420
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Sep 1;120(34):8970-86
pubmed: 27491483
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Jul 14;120(27):6555-61
pubmed: 27281682
J Biol Chem. 2018 Jun 22;293(25):9718-9723
pubmed: 29716994
Biochemistry. 2000 Nov 21;39(46):14292-304
pubmed: 11087378
Biochemistry. 2002 Apr 30;41(17):5656-67
pubmed: 11969427
J Comput Chem. 2019 Dec 5;40(31):2694-2711
pubmed: 31365132
Nature. 2007 Jun 21;447(7147):1021-5
pubmed: 17522630
Biochemistry. 1991 Mar 12;30(10):2698-706
pubmed: 2001357
Protein Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):255-69
pubmed: 26183799
J Biol Chem. 2019 Nov 8;294(45):16942-16952
pubmed: 31582563
Proteins. 2008 Aug 15;72(3):837-47
pubmed: 18260114
J Biomol NMR. 1997 Sep;10(2):143-64
pubmed: 9369015
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15420-5
pubmed: 25313042
Biochemistry. 1993 Oct 26;32(42):11270-8
pubmed: 8218192
J Mol Biol. 2011 Sep 16;412(2):267-84
pubmed: 21787785
J Chem Phys. 2017 Nov 14;147(18):184107
pubmed: 29141431
J Mol Biol. 1995 Nov 24;254(2):260-88
pubmed: 7490748
J Comput Chem. 2013 Nov 5;34(29):2493-7
pubmed: 23925979
J Chem Phys. 2011 Mar 14;134(10):105101
pubmed: 21405192
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958 Feb;44(2):98-104
pubmed: 16590179
J Mol Biol. 1998 May 15;278(4):879-94
pubmed: 9614949
Biochemistry. 1997 May 27;36(21):6529-38
pubmed: 9174370
J Mol Biol. 2007 Apr 20;368(1):244-55
pubmed: 17331534
Protein Sci. 2014 Nov;23(11):1508-18
pubmed: 25155241
Biophys J. 2003 Jul;85(1):49-60
pubmed: 12829463
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Jan 8;9(1):570-81
pubmed: 26589055
J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Jan 22;136(3):822-5
pubmed: 24364358
Proteins. 1992 Aug;13(4):275-87
pubmed: 1518799
Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Sep 17;105(12):120603
pubmed: 20867621
Protein Sci. 2002 Jan;11(1):82-91
pubmed: 11742125
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11860-4
pubmed: 8265638
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13737-41
pubmed: 19666553
Biochemistry. 1999 Feb 16;38(7):2213-23
pubmed: 10026306
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Jan;16(1):18-29
pubmed: 25531225
J Mol Graph Model. 2001;19(1):26-59
pubmed: 11381529
Proteins. 2009 Nov 15;77(3):570-88
pubmed: 19533744