Diabetic foot surgery "Made in Italy". Results of 15 years of activity of a third-level centre managed by diabetologists.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputation, Surgical
/ statistics & numerical data
Cohort Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
/ epidemiology
Diabetic Foot
/ epidemiology
Endocrinologists
Female
Humans
Italy
/ epidemiology
Limb Salvage
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Diabetic foot surgery
Diabetologists
Follow up
Outcomes
Journal
Diabetes research and clinical practice
ISSN: 1872-8227
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8508335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
19
03
2020
revised:
11
07
2020
accepted:
25
07
2020
pubmed:
3
8
2020
medline:
29
10
2020
entrez:
3
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent diabetic foot surgery (DFS) managed directly by diabetologists in a third-level Centre over 15-year. We retrospectively evaluated 1.857 patients affected by diabetic foot (Age 67.1 ± 12.3 yrs, diabetes duration 19.2 ± 9.8 yrs, HbA1c 8.1 ± 2.0%) treated in our Department between 2001 and 2015 and divided them into 3 groups: Group 1, treated between 2001 and 2005 (448 pts), group 2, between 2006 and 2010 (540 pts) and Group 3, between 2011 and 2015 (869 pts). Main clinical outcomes [peripheral revascularization rate (PR), healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), recurrences after healing (R), major amputation (MA) and death (D) rates] were compared between groups. The overall outcomes of our cohort were: HR 81.6% (HT 143 ± 54 days), PR 84.8%, MA 4.9% and D 27.9%. There were no differences in clinical characteristics, except for age, higher (p < 0.05) in Group 3 (70.6 ± 14.7 yrs) than in Groups 1 (64.4 ± 11.6 yrs) and 2 (65.1 ± 11.2 yrs). No differences emerged when comparing HR and MA; HT was shorter (p < 0.05) in group 3 (104 ± 44 days) than in Group 2 (169 ± 72 days) and 1 (235 ± 67 days). D was higher (p < 0.05) in Group 3 (43.8%) than in Group 1 (23.1%) and 2 (28.1%). PR was 19.4% in Group 1, 28.1% in Group 2 and 53.8% in Group 3 (p < 0.05). Despite the increasing age and complexity of patients our data show improvement of outcomes throughout 15 years, probably due to better surgical techniques, more aggressive medical therapy and more effective treatment of critical limb ischemia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32739379
pii: S0168-8227(20)30607-0
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108355
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108355Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.