Rationale and design of the EPLURIBUS Study (Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner).
Coronary Angiography
Equipment Design
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Multidetector Computed Tomography
/ instrumentation
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Research Design
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Function, Left
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 1558-2035
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101259752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
entrez:
3
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the standard of reference for myocardial fibrosis detection by late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is emerging as a promising alternative. The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a comprehensive functional and anatomical cardiac evaluation with CCT as compared with CMR and invasive coronary angiography as standard of reference. Consecutive patients with a newly diagnosed left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and a clinical indication to CMR will be screened. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to contrast agents and impaired renal function. CCT will be performed per protocol within 10 days from CMR. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled within 24 months. We will evaluate with CCT volume and ejection fraction of the LV and right ventricle, presence, extent and pattern of delayed enhancement and cardiac venous system. Moreover, presence and degree of coronary stenoses will be evaluated among patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography in the 6 months following CCT. The primary study endpoints will be: first, to assess the diagnostic performance of CCT vs. CMR to detect the delayed enhancement in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; second, to assess the agreement between CCT and CMR in the discrimination between ischemic vs. nonischemic delayed enhancement patters in a territory-based analysis; third, to assess the correlation between CCT and CMR for LV and right ventricle end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction measurements. The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the diagnostic performance of CCT using the latest scanner generation for a comprehensive evaluation of patients with new-onset LV dysfunction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the standard of reference for myocardial fibrosis detection by late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is emerging as a promising alternative. The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a comprehensive functional and anatomical cardiac evaluation with CCT as compared with CMR and invasive coronary angiography as standard of reference.
METHODS
METHODS
Consecutive patients with a newly diagnosed left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and a clinical indication to CMR will be screened. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to contrast agents and impaired renal function. CCT will be performed per protocol within 10 days from CMR. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled within 24 months. We will evaluate with CCT volume and ejection fraction of the LV and right ventricle, presence, extent and pattern of delayed enhancement and cardiac venous system. Moreover, presence and degree of coronary stenoses will be evaluated among patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography in the 6 months following CCT.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The primary study endpoints will be: first, to assess the diagnostic performance of CCT vs. CMR to detect the delayed enhancement in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; second, to assess the agreement between CCT and CMR in the discrimination between ischemic vs. nonischemic delayed enhancement patters in a territory-based analysis; third, to assess the correlation between CCT and CMR for LV and right ventricle end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction measurements.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the diagnostic performance of CCT using the latest scanner generation for a comprehensive evaluation of patients with new-onset LV dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32740428
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001051
pii: 01244665-202010000-00014
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
812-819Références
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2016; 69:1167.
Gimelli A, Lancellotti P, Badano LP, et al. Non-invasive cardiac imaging evaluation of patients with chronic systolic heart failure: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35:34173425.
Pickett CA, Cheezum MK, Kassop D, Villines TC, Hulten EA. Accuracy of cardiac CT, radionucleotide and invasive ventriculography, two- and three-dimensional echocardiography, and SPECT for left and right ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac MRI: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:848852.
Conte E, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, et al. Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy diagnosed at cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2018; S1934–5925:3021630218.
Asferg C, Usinger L, Kristensen TS, Abdulla J. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:e757e762.
Bakos Z, Markstad H, Ostenfeld E, Carlsson M, Roijer A, Borgquist R. Combined preoperative information using a bullseye plot from speckle tracking echocardiography, cardiac CT scan, and MRI scan: targeted left ventricular lead implantation in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15:523531.
Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006; 113:823833.
le Polain WJB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Combined coronary and late-enhanced multidetector-computed tomography for delineation of the etiology of left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:25442551.
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of coronary CT angiography performed with whole-heart coverage CT scanner with intra-cycle motion correction algorithm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Radiol 2017; 28:13831392.
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Atrial fibrillation: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed with a whole-heart 230-μm spatial resolution CT scanner. Radiology 2017; 284:676684.
Cho I, Elmore K, Ó Hartaigh B, et al. Heart-rate dependent improvement in image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography by novel intracycle motion correction algorithm. Clin Imaging 2015; 39:421426.
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed in 100 consecutive patients with coronary stents using a whole-organ high-definition CT scanner. Int J Cardiol 2018; 274:382387.
Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography carried out with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in patients with high heart rate. Int J Cardiol 2018; 257:325331.
Mendoza DD, Joshi SB, Weissman G, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG. Viability imaging by cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010; 4:8391.
Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 247:4956.
Sato A, Nozato T, Hikita H, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial contrast delayed enhancement with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:730738.
Abdel-Aty H, Zagrosek A, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004; 109:24112416.
Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Kim RJ. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of nonischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:14611474.
Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17:2962.
Skinner JS, Smeeth L, Kendall JM, Adams PC, Timmis A. Chest Pain Guideline Development Group; NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. Heart 2010; 96:974978.
Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, et al. Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT; European Society of Cardiology; European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:531556.
Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multidetector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 230:403410.
Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:312318.
Nasis A, Mottram PM, Cameron JD, Seneviratne SK. Current and evolving clinical applications of multidetector cardiac ct in assessment of structural heart disease. Radiology 2013; 267:1125.
Arsanjani R, Berman DS, Gransar H, et al. CONFIRM Investigators. Left ventricular function and volume with coronary CT angiography improves risk stratification and identification of patients at risk for incident mortality: results from 7758 patients in the prospective multinational CONFIRM observational cohort study. Radiology 2014; 273:7077.
Yamasaki Y, Nagao M, Yamamura K, et al. Quantitative assessment of right ventricular function and pulmonary regurgitation in surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot using 256-slice CT: comparison with 3-Tesla MRI. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:32893299.
Pickett CA, Cheezum MK, Kassop D, Villines TC, Hulten EA. Accuracy of cardiac CT, radionucleotide and invasive ventriculography, two- and threedimensional echocardiography, and SPECT for left and right ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac MRI: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:848852.
Esposito A, Palmisano A, Antunes S, et al. Cardiac CT with delayed enhancement in the characterization of ventricular tachycardia structural substrate relationship between CT-segmented scar and electro-anatomic mapping. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9:822832.