Osseous Integration of the Central Peg of an All-Polyethylene Glenoid With 3 Different Surgical Techniques.
Journal
Orthopedics
ISSN: 1938-2367
Titre abrégé: Orthopedics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806107
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2020
01 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
17
01
2020
accepted:
23
04
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
30
1
2021
entrez:
4
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
All-polyethylene glenoid components designed for osseous integration of the central peg can be placed with no graft (NG), autogenous bone graft (ABG), or demineralized bone matrix (DBM). The purpose of this study was to compare osseous integration with these 3 techniques. A randomized controlled trial was performed of 153 total shoulder arthroplasties using a pegged allpolyethylene glenoid component designed for osseous integration. Central peg treatment included NG, ABG, or DBM. The primary outcome was central peg osseous integration defined as bone presence between the central fins 1 year postoperatively. Central osseous integration was observed in 90% of cases treated with ABG, 68% of cases treated with DBM, and 68% of cases treated with NG (P=.022). Postoperative Wirth grading revealed radiolucency around the central peg (grade 1) in 2.4% of cases with ABG, 5.4% of cases with DBM, and 9.8% of cases with NG (P=.134). At short-term follow-up, osseous integration of the central peg of an all-polyethylene glenoid designed for bony growth between the central fins appears to be highest when treating the central peg with ABG compared with leaving the central peg untreated or using DBM. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):278-283.].
Identifiants
pubmed: 32745227
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200721-04
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyethylene
9002-88-4
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
278-283Informations de copyright
Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.