Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor DNA Genotyping With Survival Among Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma and Central Nervous System Metastases.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 08 2020
03 08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
5
8
2020
pubmed:
5
8
2020
medline:
31
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Owing to the improvement of systemic therapies for lung cancer, patients live longer, but the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases also increases. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been proven better than plasma to reveal unique genetic profiling of intracranial metastases. How genetic alterations in CSF are associated with the prognosis of this heterogeneous patient group remains elusive. To examine the association of molecular alterations in CSF with the survival of patients with a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and CNS metastases. This retrospective cohort analysis of 94 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and CNS metastases was conducted from July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. Patients' CSF samples were collected, and next-generation sequencing of CSF circulating tumor DNA was performed. The main outcome was survival after diagnosis with CNS metastases. Genotyping of CSF circulating tumor DNA was studied to examine its association with the clinical outcomes of patients with CNS metastases. Of the 94 patients (49 male; mean [SD] age, 53 [1] years) with lung adenocarcinoma and CNS metastases evaluated, 79 harbored an EGFR variant. The most common genes seen in CSF were EGFR (79 [84.0%]), TP53 (57 [60.6%]), MET (23 [24.5%]), CDKN2A (22 [23.4%]), MYC (20 [21.3%]), NTRK1 (19 [20.2%]), and CDK6 (15 [16.0%]). Cluster analysis identified 5 molecular subtypes of CNS metastases. Patients in cluster I had the shortest median survival after diagnosis of CNS metastases compared with each of the other clusters (cluster I, 7.5 months; cluster II, 55.7 months; cluster III, 17.9 months; cluster IV, 27.9 months; cluster V, 21.0 months) and significantly increased risk of death compared with patients in the other clusters (cluster II: hazard ratio [HR], 4.95; 95% CI, 1.50-16.41; P = .009; cluster III: HR, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.49-15.12; P = .008; cluster IV: HR, 6.38; 95% CI, 1.76-23.09; P = .005; cluster V: HR, 5.42; 95% CI, 1.63-17.98; P = .006). The genetic profiles of cluster I were characterized by a high detection rate of CDK4 (9 of 9 [100%]), TP53 (8 of 9 [88.9%]), MET (7 of 9 [77.8%]), and CDKN2A (7 of 9 [77.8%]). For those with EGFR variants, coalterations with CDK4 (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.03-3.96; P = .04), CDK6 (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.32-4.83; P = .005), and MYC (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.21-4.15; P = .01) were associated with poor outcomes. Patients with a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and CNS metastases experienced heterogeneous survival outcomes based on genetic profiling in CSF. These data suggest that CSF might facilitate risk stratifying CNS metastases into appropriate outcomes and provide reference for further clinical study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32749467
pii: 2768948
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9077
pmc: PMC7403922
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e209077Références
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 10;6:8839
pubmed: 26554728
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2109-2121
pubmed: 28445112
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3535-3544
pubmed: 31287555
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Mar;16(3):506-515
pubmed: 28138027
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):625-635
pubmed: 30975627
Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;111:23-29
pubmed: 28838393
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7741):654-658
pubmed: 30675060
Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):945-952
pubmed: 29346604
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):115-123
pubmed: 31682542