Phase II Randomized Trial of Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Belimumab for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis.
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Immunologic Factors
/ therapeutic use
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Lupus Nephritis
/ drug therapy
Male
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2326-5205
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
22
07
2020
pubmed:
6
8
2020
medline:
23
3
2021
entrez:
6
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN). In a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group), or treated with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients' peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab (P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group (P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with the observed impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells. The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32755035
doi: 10.1002/art.41466
pmc: PMC7839443
mid: NIHMS1629131
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Immunologic Factors
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
belimumab
73B0K5S26A
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02260934']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
121-131Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : F31 AI009565
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI109565
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM2 AI117870
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Toxicol Sci. 2006 Jun;91(2):586-99
pubmed: 16517838
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Apr 25;10:433
pubmed: 31105569
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):252-62
pubmed: 26342222
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 06;5(1):e8418
pubmed: 20066044
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Aug;65(8):2154-60
pubmed: 23754671
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64(8):2677-86
pubmed: 22553077
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jun;64(6):797-808
pubmed: 22556106
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 May;29(3):241-247
pubmed: 28207493
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;12(6):367-72
pubmed: 26888554
Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2744-54
pubmed: 18172003
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jul;65(7):942-5
pubmed: 16269424
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul;64(7):2328-37
pubmed: 22275291
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;20(5):1103-12
pubmed: 19369404
Q J Med. 1988 Nov;69(259):927-37
pubmed: 3271336
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Nov;71(11):1771-82
pubmed: 22851469
Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Dec 11;5(1):e000297
pubmed: 30613420
JCI Insight. 2018 Sep 6;3(17):
pubmed: 30185675
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 17;365(20):1886-95
pubmed: 22087680
Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271-7
pubmed: 7138600
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jan;62(1):201-10
pubmed: 20039404
J Autoimmun. 2018 Jul;91:45-54
pubmed: 29636274
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Mar;11(5):357-64
pubmed: 22032879
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;68(9):2210-20
pubmed: 27059652
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;68(6):1432-41
pubmed: 26815601
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 May;52(5):847-55
pubmed: 23287364
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):1215-26
pubmed: 22231479
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1144-6
pubmed: 25779381
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Nov;71(11):1419-1424
pubmed: 30354025
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3096-104
pubmed: 25403681
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jan;62(1):222-33
pubmed: 20039413
EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb;40:517-527
pubmed: 30593436
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;65(10):2672-9
pubmed: 23839909