Glass shape influences drinking behaviours in three laboratory experiments.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 08 2020
07 08 2020
Historique:
received:
19
03
2020
accepted:
23
07
2020
entrez:
10
8
2020
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reducing consumption of drinks which contain high levels of sugar and/or alcohol may improve population health. There is increasing interest in health behaviour change approaches which work by changing cues in physical environments ("nudges"). Glassware represents a modifiable cue in the drinking environment that may influence how much we drink. Here, we report three laboratory experiments measuring consumption of soft drinks served in different glasses (straight-sided vs. outward-sloped), using distinct paradigms to measure drinking. In Study 1 (N = 200), though total drinking time was equivalent, participants consumed a soft drink with a more 'decelerated' trajectory from outward-sloped tumblers, characterised by a greater amount consumed in the first half of the drinking episode. In Study 2 (N = 72), during a bogus taste test, participants consumed less from straight-sided wine flutes than outward-sloped martini coupes. In Study 3 (N = 40), using facial electromyography to explore a potential mechanism for decreased consumption, straight-sided glasses elicited more 'pursed' lip embouchures, which may partly explain reduced consumption from these glasses. Using a combination of methods, including objective measures of volume drunk and physiological measures, these findings suggest that switching to straight-sided glasses may be one intervention contributing to the many needed to reduce consumption of health-harming drinks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32770069
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70278-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-70278-6
pmc: PMC7414130
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13362Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N013433/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 106679/Z/14/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
GBD 2017 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 392, 1923–94 (2018).
World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/149782/9789241549028_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (2015).
World Health Organization. WHO global status report on alcohol and health. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274603/9789241565639-eng.pdf (2018).
Singh, G. M. et al. Estimated global, regional, and national disease burdens related to sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in 2010. Circulation132(8), 639–666 (2015).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636
Malik, V. S., Popkin, B. M., Bray, G. A., Després, J. P. & Hu, F. B. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation121(11), 1356–1364 (2010).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185
Te Morenga, L., Mallard, S. & Mann, J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ346, e7492 (2013).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492
Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2009).
Marteau, T. M., Hollands, G. J. & Fletcher, P. C. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science337(6101), 1492–1495 (2012).
doi: 10.1126/science.1226918
Hollands, G. J. et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health.13, 1218 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1218
Hollands, G. J. et al. The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nature Hum. Behav.1(8), 0140 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0140
Hollands, G. J., Marteau, T. M. & Fletcher, P. C. Non-conscious processes in changing health-related behaviour: a conceptual analysis and framework. Health Psychology Review.10(4), 381–394 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1138093
Zupan, Z., Evans, A., Couturier, D. L. & Marteau, T. M. Wine glass size in England from 1700 to 2017: a measure of our time. BMJ359, j5623 (2017).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5623
Pechey, R. et al. Does wine glass size influence sales for on-site consumption? A multiple treatment reversal design. BMC Public Health.16, 390 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3068-z
Pechey, R. et al. Wine glass size and wine sales: a replication study in two bars. BMC Res. Not.10, 287 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2610-0
Pilling, M., Clarke, N., Pechey, R., Hollands, G. J. & Marteau, T. M. The effect of wine glass size on volume of wine sold: a mega‐analysis of studies in bars and restaurants. Addiction. (2020).
Attwood, A. S., Scott-Samuel, N. E., Stothart, G. & Munafò, M. R. Glass shape influences consumption rate for alcoholic beverages. PLoS ONE7(8), e43007 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043007
Langfield, T., Pechey, R., Pilling, M. & Marteau, T. M. Impact of glass shape on time taken to drink a soft drink: a laboratory-based experiment. PLoS ONE13(8), e0202793 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202793
Michie, S. et al. From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: linking behaviour change techniques to their mechanisms of action. Eur. Health Psychol.18, 395 (2016).
Raghubir, P. & Krishna, A. Vital dimensions in volume perception: Can the eye fool the stomach?. J. Mark. Res.36(3), 313–326 (1999).
doi: 10.1177/002224379903600302
Troy, D. M. et al. Effect of glass shape on the pouring accuracy of liquid volume. PLoS ONE13(10), e0204562 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204562
Cliceri, D., Petit, E., Garrel, C., Monteleone, E. & Giboreau, A. Effect of glass shape on subjective and behavioral consumer responses in a real-life context of drinking consumption. Food Qual. Prefer.64, 187–191 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.008
Fridlund, A. J. & Cacioppo, J. T. Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology23(5), 567–589 (1986).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x
White, E. R. & Basmajian, J. V. Electromyography of lip muscles and their role in trumpet playing. J. Appl. Physiol.35(6), 892–897 (1973).
doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.6.892
Basmajian, J. V. & White, E. R. Neuromuscular control of trumpeters’ lips. Nature241(5384), 70 (1973).
doi: 10.1038/241070a0
Gotouda, A. et al. Influence of playing wind instruments on activity of masticatory muscles. J. Oral Rehabil.34(9), 645–651 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01765.x
Murray, K. A., Larson, C. R. & Logemann, J. A. Electromyographic response of the labial muscles during normal liquid swallows using a spoon, a straw, and a cup. Dysphagia13(3), 160–166 (1998).
doi: 10.1007/PL00009567
Maynard, O. M. et al. No impact of calorie or unit information on ad libitum alcohol consumption. Alcohol Alcohol.53(1), 12–19 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx066
Vasiljevic, M. et al. Impact of lower strength alcohol labeling on consumption: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol.37(7), 658–667 (2018).
doi: 10.1037/hea0000622
Jones, A. et al. The ad-libitum alcohol ‘taste test’: secondary analyses of potential confounds and construct validity. Psychopharmacology.233(5), 917–924 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4171-z
Robinson, E. et al. The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake. Appetite.116, 223–231 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.002
Wittes, J. & Brittain, E. The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. Stat. Med.9(1–2), 65–72 (1990).
doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090113
Kairalla, J. A., Coffey, C. S., Thomann, M. A. & Muller, K. E. Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities. Trials.13(1), 145 (2012).
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-145
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S. & Williamson, P. R. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.10(2), 307–312 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x
Clarke, N. et al. Wine glass size and wine sales: four replication studies in one restaurant and two bars. BMC Res. Not.12(1), 426 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4477-8
van Boxtel, A. Facial EMG as a tool for inferring affective states in Proceedings of Measuring Behaviour 2010. 104–108, (Eindhoven, Measuring Behaviour 2010),
Carr, E. W., Winkielman, P. & Oveis, C. Transforming the mirror: Power fundamentally changes facial responding to emotional expressions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.143(3), 997 (2014).
doi: 10.1037/a0034972
Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J. & Cacioppo, J. T. Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology40(5), 776–785 (2003).
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00078
Wu, Y., van Dijk, E. & Clark, L. Near-wins and near-losses in gambling: a behavioral and facial EMG study. Psychophysiology52(3), 359–366 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12336