Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis using an additive manufactured silicone index.
3D printing
CAD-CAM
additive manufacturing
fiber-reinforced composite restoration
polymer printing
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
25
04
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
accepted:
07
07
2020
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
10
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Digital tools such as facial and intraoral digitizers and additive manufacturing (AM) technologies assist restorative treatments. The objective of the present manuscript was to describe a workflow procedure for treatment planning and fabricating a fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) replacing an absent maxillary lateral incisor, using additively manufactured silicone indices to facilitate the clinical intervention. The elaboration of a direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration is a technique sensitive procedure which might be time-consuming for the clinician. The digital waxing helped to determine the exact position and size of the lingual wings and connectors of the fiber-reinforced FDP and to design a three-piece index. And the AM of the index helped to transfer the information to the patient's dentition accurately. The protocol minimizes the time of clinical intervention by facilitating the transference of the virtual diagnostic waxing teeth into the patient's mouth. The three-piece silicone index provides an individualized path of insertion of each index part while also providing a customized space and location of the lingual wings of the restoration. The usage of AM silicone indices facilitates the clinical intervention by translating the size and position of the diagnostic wax-up teeth into the patient's mouth, minimizing clinical procedure's time.
Substances chimiques
Silicones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
626-633Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
The glossary of the prosthodontic terms. 9th edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:e39.
Vallitu PK. Experiences of the use of glass fibers with multiphase acrylic resin systems. Theoretical background and clinical examples. In: Vallitu PK, ed. The First Symposium of Fiber Reinforced Plastics in Dentistry - Symposium Book. Turku: Biomaterials Project of the Turku University, Findland; 1999:1-35.
Vallitu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:413-418.
Ahmed KE, Li KY, Murray CA. Longevity of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures (FRC FDP) - systematic review. J Dent. 2017;61:1-11.
Vallittu P, Özcan M. Clinical Guide to Principles of Fiber-Reinforced Composites in Dentistry. 1st ed. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2017:33-53.
Xie Q, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs. J Dent. 2007;35:578-582.
Khan AS, Azam MT, Khan M, et al. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composites: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;47:26-39.
Alraheam IA, Ngoc CN, Wiesen CA, Donovan TE. Five-year success rate of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:40-50.
Thoma DS, Sailer I, Ioannidis A, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;2811:1421-1432.
Kumbuloglu O, Özcan M. Clinical survival of indirect, anterior 3-unit surface-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis: up to 7.5-years follow-up. J Dent. 2015;43:656-663.
Van Heumen CC, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH. Clinical studies of fiber-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:1-6.
Joda T, Gallucci GO, Wismeijer D, Zitzmann NU. Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: a systematic review. Comput Biol Med. 2019;108:93-100.
Achermann B, Jiang X, Bunke H. Face recognition using range images. Proceedings of International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multi Media; 1997, pp. 129-136.
Zhao YJ, Xiong YX, Wang Y. Three-dimensional accuracy of facial scan for facial deformities in clinics: a new evaluation method for facial scanner accuracy. PloS One. 2017;12:e0169402.
Bohner L, Gamba DD, Hanisch M, et al. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:246-251.
Piedra-Cascón W, Hsu V, Revilla-León M. Facially driven digital diagnostic waxing: new software features to simulate and define restorative outcomes. Curr Health Oral Rep. 2019;6:284-294.
Revilla-León M, Raney L, Piedra-Cascón W, et al. Digital workflow for an esthetic rehabilitation using a facial and intraoral scanner and an additive manufactured silicone index: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(4):564-570.
Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:184-190.
Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:328-335.
Khraishi H, Duane B. Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions for obtaining full-arch digital impressions is insufficient. Evid Based Dent. 2017;18:24-25.
Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26:101-121.
Kim J, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Shin IH, Kim M. Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:221-230.
Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:225-232.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral scanners technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:1-9.
Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:343-349.
Revilla-León M, Peng J, Sadeghpour M, et al. Intraoral digital scans. Part 1. Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003.
Revilla-León M, Peng J, Sadeghpour M, et al. Intraoral digital scans. Part 2. Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.004.
Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:107-113.
Carbajal Mejía JB, Wakabayashi K, Nakamura T, Yatani H. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:392-399.
Li H, Lyu P, Wang Y, Sun Y. Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder-free intraoral scanner: a laboratory study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:93-101.
Anh JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim M, Kim M. A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by two intraoral scanners: effects on tooth irregularities and scanning direction. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46:3-12.
ISO/ASTM52900:2015 [ASTM F2792]. Additive manufacturing - General principles and terminology. https://www.iso.org/standard/69669.html. Accessed January 06, 2019.
Revilla-León M, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2019;22:146-158.
Revilla-León M, Besné-Torre A, Sánchez-Rubio JL, Fábrega JJ, Özcan M. Digital tools and 3D printing technologies integrated into the workflow of restorative treatment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:3-8.
Revilla-León M, Fountain J, Piedra Cascón W, Özcan M, Zandinejad A. Workflow description of additively manufactured clear silicone indexes for injected provisional restorations: a novel technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:213-221.
Revilla-León M, Fountain J, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. Silicone additive manufactured indices performed from a virtual diagnostic waxing for direct composite diastema closure combined with resin infiltration technique on white spot lesions: a case report. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:855-860.