Unusual Sites of Necrotic Collections in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Association with Parenchymal Necrosis and Clinical Outcomes.


Journal

Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
accepted: 29 07 2020
pubmed: 11 8 2020
medline: 9 9 2021
entrez: 11 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The presence of necrotic collection in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) at intra-abdominal sites other than the retroperitoneum has not been systematically studied. To investigate unusual sites of necrotic collections at computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate association with pancreatic necrosis and clinical outcomes. This retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients with ANP evaluated between January 2018 and March 2019. Based on CT findings, patients were divided into two groups: collections at unusual sites (small bowel mesentery, mesocolon, omentum, subcapsular collections along liver and spleen, pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, and inguinoscrotal regions) and collections at usual retroperitoneal locations (lesser sac, gastrosplenic location, anterior and posterior pararenal spaces, and paracolic gutters). The differences in CT findings and clinical outcomes (need for drainage, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, surgery, and death) between the two groups were evaluated. A total of 75 patients with ANP were evaluated. There were 25 (33.3%) patients with collections in unusual locations. These included mesentery (n = 17), splenic subcapsular location (n = 7), omentum (n = 6), hepatic subcapsular location (n = 4), anterior abdominal wall (n = 3), pelvis (n = 2), and inguinoscrotal location (n = 1). Compared to patients with collections at usual locations (n = 50), there were no differences in the CT findings except complete parenchymal necrosis (32% vs. 0%, P = .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Mesenteric collections are frequent in ANP. The other non-retroperitoneal sites are infrequently involved. There is no association between unusual sites of collection and clinical outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The presence of necrotic collection in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) at intra-abdominal sites other than the retroperitoneum has not been systematically studied.
AIM
To investigate unusual sites of necrotic collections at computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate association with pancreatic necrosis and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
This retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients with ANP evaluated between January 2018 and March 2019. Based on CT findings, patients were divided into two groups: collections at unusual sites (small bowel mesentery, mesocolon, omentum, subcapsular collections along liver and spleen, pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, and inguinoscrotal regions) and collections at usual retroperitoneal locations (lesser sac, gastrosplenic location, anterior and posterior pararenal spaces, and paracolic gutters). The differences in CT findings and clinical outcomes (need for drainage, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, surgery, and death) between the two groups were evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 75 patients with ANP were evaluated. There were 25 (33.3%) patients with collections in unusual locations. These included mesentery (n = 17), splenic subcapsular location (n = 7), omentum (n = 6), hepatic subcapsular location (n = 4), anterior abdominal wall (n = 3), pelvis (n = 2), and inguinoscrotal location (n = 1). Compared to patients with collections at usual locations (n = 50), there were no differences in the CT findings except complete parenchymal necrosis (32% vs. 0%, P = .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Mesenteric collections are frequent in ANP. The other non-retroperitoneal sites are infrequently involved. There is no association between unusual sites of collection and clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32776270
doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06526-6
pii: 10.1007/s10620-020-06526-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2362-2367

Références

Dhaka N, Sinha SK, Samanta J, et al. Impact of the site of necrosis on outcome of acute pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2018;2:295–299.
doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12087
Gupta P, Rana P, Bellam BL, et al. Site and size of extrapancreatic necrosis are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2020;20:9–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.11.010
Chi XX, Zhang XM, Chen TW, et al. The normal transverse mesocolon and involvement of the mesocolon in acute pancreatitis: an MRI study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93687.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093687
Jardosh Y, Bhagat H, Sharma R, Upadhya D. Pancreatic pseudocysts and their unusual locations. Natl J Med Res. 2016;6:251–256.
Kumar P, Gupta P, Rana S. Thoracic complications of pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2018;3:71–79.
doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12099
Kalia S, Gupta R, Shenvi SD, et al. Inguinoscrotal region as an unusual site of extrapancreatic collections in infected pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016;4:246–250.
doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou090
Lee AD, Abraham DT, Agarwal S, et al. The scrotum in pancreatitis-case report and review of literature. JOP. 2004;5:357–359.
pubmed: 15365203
Kim SB, Je BK, Lee SH, et al. Scrotal swelling caused by acute necrotizing pancreatitis: CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36:218–221.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-010-9638-0
Branco JC, Cardoso MF, Lourenço LC, et al. A rare cause of abdominal pain in a patient with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018;25:253–257.
doi: 10.1159/000484939
Kamble PM, Patil A, Jadhav S, Rao SA. Anterior abdominal wall abscess with epididymo-orchitis: an unusual presentation of acute pancreatitis. J Postgrad Med. 2011;57:335–337.
doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.90088
Mallick B, Dhaka N, Gupta P, et al. An audit of percutaneous drainage for acute necrotic collections and walled off necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018;18:727–733.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.010
Ishikawa K, Idoguchi K, Tanaka H, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis based on retroperitoneal extension: application of the concept of interfascial planes. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:445–452.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.014
De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, De Vos M, Duyck P, Colardyn FA. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas. 2007;34:185–190.
doi: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31802d4136
Mendez G Jr, Isikoff MB, Hill MC. CT of acute pancreatitis: interim assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135:463–469.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.3.463
Malka D, Hammel P, Lévy P, et al. Splenic complications in chronic pancreatitis: prevalence and risk factors in a medical-surgical series of 500 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1645–1649.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00952.x
Heider R, Behrns KE. Pancreatic pseudocysts complicated by splenic parenchymal involvement: results of operative and percutaneous management. Pancreas. 2001;23:20–25.
doi: 10.1097/00006676-200107000-00003
Mortele KJ, Mergo PJ, Taylor HM, Ernst MD, Ros PR. Splenic and perisplenic involvement in acute pancreatitis: determination of prevalence and morphologic helical CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:50–54.
doi: 10.1097/00004728-200101000-00009
Hastings OM, Jain KM, Khademi M, Lazaro EJ. Intrasplenic pancreatic pseudocyst complicating severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1978;69:182–186.
pubmed: 665640
Okuda K, Sugita S, Tsukada E, Sakuma Y, Ohkubo K. Pancreatic pseudocyst in the left hepatic lobe: a report of two cases. Hepatology. 1991;13:359–363.
doi: 10.1002/hep.1840130225
Demeusy A, Hosseini M, Sill AM, Cunningham SC. Intrahepatic pancreatic pseudocyst: a review of the world literature. World J Hepatol. 2016;8:1576–1583.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i35.1576
Gupta P, Gupta J, Kumar C, et al. Aggressive percutaneous catheter drainage protocol for necrotic pancreatic collections. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06116-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06116-6 pubmed: 33141389
Gupta P, Koshi S, Samanta J, et al. Kissing catheter technique for percutaneous catheter drainage of necrotic pancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis. Exp Ther Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8897 .
doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8897 pubmed: 32765710 pmcid: 7401886
Gupta P, Dawra S, Chandel K, et al. Fat-modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) is a better predictor of severity and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis compared with modified CTSI. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02473-y .
doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02473-y
Gupta P, Jain R, Koshi S, et al. Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45:1517–1523.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02408-7

Auteurs

Pankaj Gupta (P)

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India. Pankajgupta959@gmail.com.

Mandeep Virk (M)

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Ajay Gulati (A)

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Gaurav Muktesh (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Jimil Shah (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Jayanta Samanta (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Harshal Mandavdhare (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Vishal Sharma (V)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Usha Dutta (U)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Rakesh Kochhar (R)

Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH