International harmonization in performing and reporting minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma trials.


Journal

Leukemia
ISSN: 1476-5551
Titre abrégé: Leukemia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704895

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 19 06 2020
accepted: 29 07 2020
revised: 27 07 2020
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 14 1 2021
entrez: 12 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is incorporated in an increasing number of multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials as a correlative analysis, an endpoint or even as a determinant of subsequent therapy. There is substantial heterogeneity across clinical trials in how MRD is assessed and reported, creating challenges for data interpretation and for the design of subsequent studies. We convened an international panel of MM investigators to harmonize how MRD should be assessed and reported in MM clinical trials. The panel provides consensus on which MM trials should include MRD, the recommended time points for MRD assessment, and expected analytical validation for MRD assays. We subsequently outlined parameters for reporting MRD results implementing the intention-to-treat principle. The panel provides guidance regarding the incorporation of newer peripheral blood-based and imaging-based approaches to detection of residual disease. Recommendations are summarized in 13 consensus statements that should be followed by sponsors, investigators, editors, and reviewers engaged in designing, performing, and interpreting MM trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32778736
doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01012-4
pii: 10.1038/s41375-020-01012-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18-30

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR003143
Pays : United States

Références

Holstein SA, Howard A, Avigan D, Bhutani M, Cohen AD, Costa LJ, et al. Summary of the 2019 Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26:e7–e15.
Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–46.
pubmed: 27511158 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6
US FDA. Hematologic malignancies: regulatory considerations for use of minimal residual disease in development of drug and biological products for treatment-guidance for industry. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/134605/download . Accessed May 2020.
EMA. Guideline on the use of minimal residual disease as a clinical endpoint in multiple myeloma studies. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/draft-guideline-use-minimal-residual-disease-clinical-endpoint-multiple-myeloma-studies_en.pdf .
Shi Q, Flowers CR, Hiddemann W, Marcus R, Herold M, Hagenbeek A, et al. Thirty-month complete response as a surrogate end point in first-line follicular lymphoma therapy: an individual patient-level analysis of multiple randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:552–60.
pubmed: 28029309 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.8651
Sargent DJ, Shi Q, Flowers CR, Schmitz N, Habermann TM, Flament J, et al. The search for surrogate endpoints in trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the surrogate endpoints for Aggressive Lymphoma Project. Oncologist. 2017;22:1415–8.
pubmed: 28798271 pmcid: 5728027 doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0177
Holstein SA, Al-Kadhimi Z, Costa LJ, Hahn T, Hari P, Hillengass J, et al. Summary of the Third Annual Blood And Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on minimal residual disease and immune profiling. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:e7–e15.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.015
Wood B, Jevremovic D, Bene MC, Yan M, Jacobs P, Litwin V, et al. Validation of cell-based fluorescence assays: practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS - part V - assay performance criteria. Cytom B Clin Cytom. 2013;84:315–23.
doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21108
Romano A, Palumbo GA, Parrinello NL, Conticello C, Martello M, Terragna C. Minimal residual disease assessment within the bone marrow of multiple myeloma: a review of caveats, clinical significance and future perspectives. Front Oncol. 2019;9:699.
pubmed: 31482061 pmcid: 6710454 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699
Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:28–35.
pubmed: 27632282 pmcid: 5943640 doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160
Lahuerta J-J, Paiva B, Vidriales M-B, Cordón L, Cedena M-T, Puig N, et al. Depth of response in multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2900–10.
pubmed: 28498784 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517
Paiva B, Cedena MT, Puig N, Arana P, Vidriales MB, Cordon L, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients. Blood. 2016;127:3165–74.
pubmed: 27118453 doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-705319
Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Paiva B, Puig N, Garcia-Sanchez O, Bottcher S, et al. Next generation flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017;31:2094–103.
pubmed: 28104919 pmcid: 5629369 doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.29
Roshal M, Flores-Montero JA, Gao Q, Koeber M, Wardrope J, Durie BGM, et al. MRD detection in multiple myeloma: comparison between MSKCC 10-color single-tube and EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube methods. Blood Adv. 2017;1:728–32.
pubmed: 29296716 pmcid: 5728052 doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003715
Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, et al. Measurable residual disease by next-generation flow cytometry in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;38:784–92.
Bahlis NJ, Dimopoulos MA, White DJ, Benboubker L, Cook G, Leiba M, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: extended follow-up of POLLUX, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study. Leukemia. 2020;34:1875–84.
Mateos MV, Dimopoulos MA, Cavo M, Suzuki K, Jakubowiak A, Knop S, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:518–28.
pubmed: 29231133 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714678
Spencer A, Lentzsch S, Weisel K, Avet-Loiseau H, Mark TM, Spicka I, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica. 2018;103:2079–87.
pubmed: 30237264 pmcid: 6269293 doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194118
Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2456–64.
pubmed: 30249784 pmcid: 6284215 doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858613
clonoSEQ®. ClonoSEQ techinical summary. Seattle, WA: Adaptive Biotechnologies; 2018. https://www.clonoseq.com/technical-summary .
Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Pepin F, Gonzalez M, Barrio S, Ayala R, et al. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;123:3073–9.
pubmed: 24646471 pmcid: 4023416 doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020
Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Godby KN, Medvedova E, Cornell RF, Hall AC, et al. Daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd) induction, autologous transplantation and post-transplant, response-adapted, measurable residual disease (MRD)-based Dara-Krd consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Blood. 2019;134:860–860.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-123170
Arcila ME, Yu W, Syed M, Kim H, Maciag L, Yao J, et al. Establishment of immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) Chain clonality testing by next-generation sequencing for routine characterization of B-cell and plasma cell neoplasms. J Mol Diagn. 2019;21:330–42.
pubmed: 30590126 pmcid: 6436112 doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.10.008
Puig N, Sarasquete ME, Balanzategui A, Martinez J, Paiva B, Garcia H, et al. Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry. Leukemia. 2014;28:391–7.
pubmed: 23860448 doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.217
Takamatsu H. Comparison of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry, ASO-qPCR, droplet digital PCR, and deep sequencing in patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. J Clin Med. 2017;6:91.
Oliva S, Genuardi E, Belotti A, Frascione PMM, Galli M, Capra A, et al. Minimal residual disease evaluation by multiparameter flow cytometry and next generation sequencing in the forte trial for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2019;134:4322–4322.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-124645
Avet-Loiseau H, Bene MC, Wuilleme S, Corre J, Attal M, Arnulf B, et al. Concordance of post-consolidation minimal residual disease rates by multiparametric flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing in CASSIOPEIA. Clin Lymph Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19: e3–4.
Moreau P, Attal M, Hulin C, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:29–38.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31240-1 pubmed: 31171419
Torlakovic EE, Brynes RK, Hyjek E, Lee SH, Kreipe H, Kremer M, et al. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow immunohistochemistry. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:431–49.
pubmed: 25977137 doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12365
Sanoja-Flores L, Flores-Montero J, Puig N, Contreras-Sanfeliciano T, Pontes R, Corral-Mateos A, et al. Blood monitoring of circulating tumor plasma cells by next generation flow in multiple myeloma after therapy. Blood. 2019;134:2218–22.
pubmed: 31697808 pmcid: 6966491 doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002610
Oberle A, Brandt A, Voigtlaender M, Thiele B, Radloff J, Schulenkorf A, et al. Monitoring multiple myeloma by next-generation sequencing of V(D)J rearrangements from circulating myeloma cells and cell-free myeloma DNA. Haematologica. 2017;102:1105–11.
pubmed: 28183851 pmcid: 5451343 doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.161414
Mazzotti C, Buisson L, Maheo S, Perrot A, Chretien ML, Leleu X, et al. Myeloma MRD by deep sequencing from circulating tumor DNA does not correlate with results obtained in the bone marrow. Blood Adv. 2018;2:2811–3.
pubmed: 30355580 pmcid: 6234381 doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018025197
Vij R, Mazumder A, Klinger M, O’Dea D, Paasch J, Martin T, et al. Deep sequencing reveals myeloma cells in peripheral blood in majority of multiple myeloma patients. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014;14:131–9.e131.
pubmed: 24629890 doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.09.013
Puig N, Mateos M-V, Contreras T, Paiva B, Cedena MT, Pérez JJ, et al. Qip-mass spectrometry in high risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: comparison with conventional and minimal residual disease IMWG response assessment. Blood. 2019;134:581–581.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-127717
Eveillard M, Rustad E, Roshal M, Zhang Y, Ciardiello A, Korde N, et al. Comparison of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow-based flow cytometry for tracking measurable residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2020;189:904–7.
Noem P, Contreras T, Paiva B, Cedena MT, Martinez-Lopez J, Oriol A, et al. Analysis of treatment efficacy in the GEM-CESAR trial for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients: Comparison between the standard and IMWG MRD criteria and QIP-MS including FLC (QIP-FLC-MS). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:8512.
Derman BA, Stefka AT, McIver A, Jiang K, Kubicki T, Jasielec J. Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by mass spectrometry (MS) in peripheral blood versus next generation sequencing (NGS) in bone marrow in multiple myeloma treated on phase II trial of KRd+ASCT. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:8513.
Varettoni M, Corso A, Pica G, Mangiacavalli S, Pascutto C, Lazzarino M. Incidence, presenting features and outcome of extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a longitudinal study on 1003 consecutive patients. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:325–30.
pubmed: 19633044 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp329
Usmani SZ, Heuck C, Mitchell A, Szymonifka J, Nair B, Hoering A, et al. Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents. Haematologica. 2012;97:1761–7.
pubmed: 22689675 pmcid: 3487453 doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065698
Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, Siegel D, Jagannath S, Madduri D, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1726–37.
pubmed: 31042825 pmcid: 8202968 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817226
Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, Trudel S, Nooka AK, Chari A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): a two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;21:207–21.
Hillengass J, Usmani S, Rajkumar SV, Durie BGM, Mateos MV, Lonial S, et al. International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:e302–12.
pubmed: 31162104 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30309-2
Moreau P, Attal M, Caillot D, Macro M, Karlin L, Garderet L, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography at diagnosis and before maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: results of the IMAJEM Study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35: 2911–8.
Moreau P, Zweegman S, Perrot A, Hulin C, Caillot D, Facon T, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) at diagnosis and follow-up in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TE NDMM) patients treated in the Phase 3 Cassiopeia Study: results of the Cassiopet Companion Study. Blood. 2019;134:692–692.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-123143
Alonso R, Cedena MT, Gomez-Grande A, Rios R, Moraleda JM, Cabanas V, et al. Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:853–61.
Rasche L, Alapat D, Kumar M, Gershner G, McDonald J, Wardell CP, et al. Combination of flow cytometry and functional imaging for monitoring of residual disease in myeloma. Leukemia. 2019;33:1713–22.
pubmed: 30573775 doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0329-0
Rasche L, Angtuaco E, McDonald JE, Buros A, Stein C, Pawlyn C, et al. Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;130:30–4.
pubmed: 28432222 pmcid: 5501152 doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-774422
Ulaner GA, Sobol NB, O’Donoghue JA, Kirov AS, Riedl CC, Min R, et al. CD38-targeted immuno-PET of multiple myeloma: from xenograft models to first-in-human imaging. Radiology. 2020;295:192621.
Krishnan AY, Adhikarla V, Chaudhry A, Palmer J, Poku EK, Biglang-awa VE, et al. First-in-human imaging of multiple myeloma using copper-64-labeled daratumumab: preliminary results. Blood. 2019;134:4394–4394.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-126080
Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, Mateos MV, Grande C, Alegre A, Garcia-Larana J, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:529–34.
pubmed: 21482708 doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-332320
Harousseau JL, Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Charbonnel C, Garban F, Hulin C, et al. Achievement of at least very good partial response is a simple and robust prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy: long-term analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5720–6.
pubmed: 19826130 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1060
Gay F, Larocca A, Wijermans P, Cavallo F, Rossi D, Schaafsma R, et al. Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. Blood. 2011;117:3025–31.
pubmed: 21228328 doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307645
Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Rosinol L, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5775–82.
pubmed: 19001321 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9721
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N. Engl J Med. 2019;380:2104–15.
pubmed: 31141632 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817249
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1319–31.
pubmed: 27705267 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751
Palumbo A, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, Nooka AK, Masszi T, Beksac M, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:754–66.
pubmed: 27557302 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606038
Munshi NC, Berdeja JG, Lin Y, Kochenderfer J, Raje NS, Liedtke M, et al. Early MRD negativity to predict deepening myeloma response in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with bb2121 anti-BCMA CAR T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:8024–8024.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8024
Costa LJ, Wong SW, Bermúdez A, de la Rubia J, Mateos M-V, Ocio EM, et al. First clinical study of the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) 2+1 T cell engager (TCE) CC-93269 in patients (Pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): interim results of a phase 1 multicenter trial. Blood. 2019;134:143–143.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-122895
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–548.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5 pubmed: 25439696
Mateos MV, Hernandez MT, Giraldo P, de la Rubia J, de Arriba F, Lopez Corral L, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl J Med. 2013;369:438–47.
pubmed: 23902483 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300439
Lonial S, Jacobus S, Fonseca R, Weiss M, Kumar S, Orlowski RZ, et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide versus observation in smoldering multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1126–37.
pubmed: 31652094 doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01740
Mateos M-V, Martinez-Lopez J, Rodriguez Otero P, Gonzalez-Calle V, Gonzalez MS, Oriol A, et al. Curative strategy (GEM-CESAR) for high-risk smoldering myeloma (SMM): carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) as induction followed by HDT-ASCT, consolidation with Krd and maintenance with Rd. Blood. 2019;134:781–781.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-125204
Korde N, Roschewski M, Zingone A, Kwok M, Manasanch EE, Bhutani M, et al. Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:746–54.
pubmed: 26181891 pmcid: 6662597 doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2010
Landgren O, Hultcrantz M, Lesokhin AM, Mailankody S, Hassoun H, Smith EL, et al. Weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and daratumumab (wKRd-D) combination therapy provides unprecedented MRD negativity rates in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical and correlative phase 2 study. Blood. 2019;134:862–862.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-126378
Wang X, Zhou J, Wang T, George SL. On enrichment strategies for biomarker stratified clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28:292–308.
pubmed: 28933670 doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1379532
Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–9.
pubmed: 26240224 pmcid: 4846284 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267
Gopalakrishnan S, D’Souza A, Scott E, Fraser R, Davila O, Shah N, et al. Revised international staging system is predictive and prognostic for early relapse (<24 months) after autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;25:683–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.141
Mikhael JR, Dingli D, Roy V, Reeder CB, Buadi FK, Hayman SR, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:360–76.
pubmed: 23541011 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.019
Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:548–67.
doi: 10.1002/ajh.25791 pubmed: 32212178
Gokbuget N, Dombret H, Bonifacio M, Reichle A, Graux C, Faul C, et al. Blinatumomab for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2018;131:1522–31.
pubmed: 29358182 pmcid: 6027091 doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-08-798322
Lin T, Hampras S, Krey R, Pei H, Qi M, Krevvata M, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after frontline transplant: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 3 Study (AURIGA). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19:e199.
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.332
Morè S, Corvatta L, Maracci L, Costantini B, Olivieri A, Offidani M. Developments in consolidation and maintenance strategies in post-remission multiple myeloma. Exp Rev Hematol. 2020;13:351–62.
Voorhees PM, Kaufman JL, Laubach JP, Sborov DW, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, & dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: GRIFFIN. Blood. 2020:32325490.
Gay F, Cerrato C, Petrucci MT, Zambello R, Gamberi B, Ballanti S, et al. Efficacy of carfilzomib lenalidomide dexamethasone (KRd) with or without transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma according to risk status: results from the FORTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:8002–8002.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8002
Rawstron AC, Gregory WM, de Tute RM, Davies FE, Bell SE, Drayson MT, et al. Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction. Blood. 2015;125:1932–5.
pubmed: 25645353 pmcid: 4375716 doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-590166
Paiva B, Martinez-Lopez J, Vidriales MB, Mateos MV, Montalban MA, Fernandez-Redondo E, et al. Comparison of immunofixation, serum free light chain, and immunophenotyping for response evaluation and prognostication in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1627–33.
pubmed: 21402611 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1967
Rasche L, Chavan SS, Stephens OW, Patel PH, Tytarenko R, Ashby C, et al. Spatial genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma revealed by multi-region sequencing. Nat Commun. 2017;8:268.
pubmed: 28814763 pmcid: 5559527 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00296-y
Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:5989–95.
pubmed: 21900189 doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386

Auteurs

Luciano J Costa (LJ)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. ljcosta@uabmc.edu.

Benjamin A Derman (BA)

Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Susan Bal (S)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Surbhi Sidana (S)

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Saurabh Chhabra (S)

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Rebecca Silbermann (R)

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.

Jing C Ye (JC)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Gordon Cook (G)

Haematology & Myeloma Studies, Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Robert F Cornell (RF)

Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Sarah A Holstein (SA)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Qian Shi (Q)

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

James Omel (J)

Independent Patient Advocate, Omaha, NE, USA.

Natalie S Callander (NS)

Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Wee Joo Chng (WJ)

National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Vania Hungria (V)

Clinica São Germano, São Paulo, Brazil.

Angelo Maiolino (A)

Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Edward Stadtmauer (E)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Sergio Giralt (S)

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Marcelo Pasquini (M)

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Andrzej J Jakubowiak (AJ)

Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Gareth J Morgan (GJ)

New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Amrita Krishnan (A)

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.

Graham H Jackson (GH)

Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Mohamad Mohty (M)

Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.

Maria Victoria Mateos (MV)

Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Meletious A Dimopoulos (MA)

School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Thierry Facon (T)

Service des Maladies du Sang, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.

Andrew Spencer (A)

Malignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, VA, Australia.

Jesus San Miguel (JS)

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Parameswaran Hari (P)

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Saad Z Usmani (SZ)

Plasma Cell Disorders Division, Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Salomon Manier (S)

Department of Hematology, Université de Lille, CHU, Lille, France.

Phillip McCarthy (P)

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Shaji Kumar (S)

Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.

Francesca Gay (F)

Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Bruno Paiva (B)

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH