Comparing progression biomarkers in clinical trials of early Alzheimer's disease.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
/ blood
Biomarkers
Clinical Trials as Topic
/ standards
Cohort Studies
Datasets as Topic
Female
Hippocampus
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neurofilament Proteins
/ blood
Neuropsychological Tests
/ standards
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
/ standards
Prodromal Symptoms
Research Design
/ standards
Severity of Illness Index
Temporal Lobe
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
Annals of clinical and translational neurology
ISSN: 2328-9503
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623278
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
27
05
2020
revised:
04
07
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
12
8
2020
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
12
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the statistical power of plasma, imaging, and cognition biomarkers as Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trial outcome measures. Plasma neurofilament light, structural magnetic resonance imaging, and cognition were measured longitudinally in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) in control (amyloid PET or CSF Aβ42 negative [Aβ-] with Clinical Dementia Rating scale [CDR] = 0; n = 330), preclinical AD (Aβ + with CDR = 0; n = 218) and mild AD (Aβ + with CDR = 0.5-1; n = 697) individuals. A statistical power analysis was performed across biomarkers and groups based on longitudinal mixed effects modeling and using several different clinical trial designs. For a 30-month trial of preclinical AD, both the temporal composite and hippocampal volumes were superior to plasma neurofilament light and cognition. For an 18-month trial of mild AD, hippocampal volume was superior to all other biomarkers. Plasma neurofilament light became more effective with increased trial duration or sampling frequency. Imaging biomarkers were characterized by high slope and low within-subject variability, while plasma neurofilament light and cognition were characterized by higher within-subject variability. MRI measures had properties that made them preferable to cognition and pNFL as outcome measures in clinical trials of early AD, regardless of cognitive status. However, pNfL and cognition can still be effective depending on inclusion criteria, sampling frequency, and response to therapy. Future trials will help to understand how sensitive pNfL and MRI are to detect downstream effects on neurodegeneration of drugs targeting amyloid and tau pathology in AD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32779869
doi: 10.1002/acn3.51158
pmc: PMC7480920
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Neurofilament Proteins
0
neurofilament protein L
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1661-1673Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 681712
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Références
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Jul;11(7):757-71
pubmed: 26194311
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2009;21:239-51
pubmed: 19694267
Neurology. 2019 Jul 16;93(3):e252-e260
pubmed: 31182505
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;49(4):1123-34
pubmed: 26639957
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):318-325
pubmed: 30508027
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):387-397
pubmed: 32123386
Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1007-e1015
pubmed: 30737333
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 11;380(15):1408-1420
pubmed: 30970186
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):249-254
pubmed: 29420472
EBioMedicine. 2015 Nov 22;3:135-140
pubmed: 26870824
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):19024
pubmed: 31836810
Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1647-e1659
pubmed: 31371569
Nat Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):277-283
pubmed: 30664784
Neurology. 2017 Nov 21;89(21):2167-2175
pubmed: 29070659
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):791-799
pubmed: 31009028
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1402-18
pubmed: 22430496
J Neurol. 2019 Sep;266(9):2129-2136
pubmed: 31123861
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 24;:
pubmed: 31233127
Brain. 2015 Dec;138(Pt 12):3747-59
pubmed: 26428666
Neurology. 2010 Jan 19;74(3):201-9
pubmed: 20042704
Neurology. 2014 Nov 18;83(21):1945-53
pubmed: 25339208
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Jul 09;5:272-293
pubmed: 31334330
J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):567-74
pubmed: 25745095
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 17;:
pubmed: 31206160
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Aug;14(8):989-997
pubmed: 29626426
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):379-386
pubmed: 32123385
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Oct;14(10):577-589
pubmed: 30171200
Lancet Neurol. 2020 May;19(5):422-433
pubmed: 32333900
Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):937-47
pubmed: 9290224
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26 Suppl 3:369-77
pubmed: 21971476
Ann Neurol. 2019 Apr;85(4):606-610
pubmed: 30761586