Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 21 05 2020
accepted: 23 07 2020
entrez: 12 8 2020
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Soil archives are an important resource in agronomic and ecosystem sciences. If microbial communities could be reconstructed from archived soil DNA, as prehistoric plant communities are reconstructed via pollen data, soil archive resources would assume even greater value for reconstructing land-use history, forensic science, and biosphere modelling. Yet, the effects of long-term soil archival on the preservation of microbial DNA is still largely unknown. To address this, we assessed the capacity of high-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) of ITS (internal transcribed spacer) and prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes for reconstructing soil microbial communities across a 20 years time-series. We studied air-dried soil archives and fresh soil samples taken from Populus bioenergy and deciduous forest research plots at the Kellogg Biological Station. Habitat and archival time explained significant amounts of variation in soil microbial α- and β-diversity both in fungal and prokaryotic communities. We found that microbial richness, diversity, and abundance generally decreased with storage time, but varied between habitat and taxonomic groups. The high relative abundance of ectomycorrhizal species including Hebeloma and Cortinarius detected in older soil archives raises questions regarding traits such as long-term persistence and viability of ectomycorrhizal propagules in soils, with relevance to forest health and ecosystem succession. Talaromyces, Paecilomyces and Epicoccum spp. were detected in fresh and across 20-year-old archived soils and were also cultured from these soils demonstrating their long-term spore viability. In summary, we found that microbial DNA in air-dried soils archived over the past 20 years degraded with time, in a manner that differed between soil types and phylogenetic groups of microbes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32780777
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237368
pii: PONE-D-20-15299
pmc: PMC7418970
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0237368

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

ISME J. 2019 Dec;13(12):3126-3130
pubmed: 31388130
Microbiome. 2017 Mar 3;5(1):27
pubmed: 28253908
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):683-93
pubmed: 16706913
Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8
pubmed: 8180733
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(1):288-99
pubmed: 23534863
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 24;12(3):e0173901
pubmed: 28339464
Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;31(21):3476-82
pubmed: 26139637
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 26;7:e7744
pubmed: 31579614
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Sep 1;366(17):
pubmed: 31603508
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Sep;57(3):420-8
pubmed: 16907756
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):7
pubmed: 23587224
Res Microbiol. 2009 Mar;160(2):89-98
pubmed: 19111612
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
pubmed: 16820507
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;48(1):5-17
pubmed: 22567879
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1525-36
pubmed: 25494880
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Jun;307(1):80-6
pubmed: 20412303
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Dec 19;2:16242
pubmed: 27991881
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D19-21
pubmed: 21062823
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2019 Apr;11(2):173-184
pubmed: 30507072
Elife. 2019 Sep 10;8:
pubmed: 31502536
J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Apr;81(1):48-55
pubmed: 20138194
Science. 2004 Oct 29;306(5697):813
pubmed: 15514139
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e87217
pubmed: 24489873
Bioinformatics. 2014 Mar 1;30(5):614-20
pubmed: 24142950
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Dec;12(12):789-90
pubmed: 25564681
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 03;10(4):e1003531
pubmed: 24699258
New Phytol. 2009 Jan;181(2):463-470
pubmed: 19121040
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70460
pubmed: 23936206
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Mar;13(3):1
pubmed: 25685915
Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271-7
pubmed: 24112409
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Dec 06;18(1):538
pubmed: 29212440
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5881-6
pubmed: 20231463
Mol Ecol. 2017 Jun;26(11):2895-2904
pubmed: 28261928
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 7;268(1484):2479-84
pubmed: 11747567

Auteurs

Gian Maria Niccolò Benucci (GMN)

Plant, Soil and Microbial Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

Bryan Rennick (B)

Plant, Soil and Microbial Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

Gregory Bonito (G)

Plant, Soil and Microbial Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals

Classifications MeSH