A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study).
Pseudomonas
KPC
carbapenem resistant
mechanical ventilation
nosocomial pneumonia
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 12 2021
06 12 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
16
07
2020
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
14
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population. Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients. NCT02493764.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).
METHODS
This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.
RESULTS
Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT02493764.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32785589
pii: 5891450
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa803
pmc: PMC8662781
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Azabicyclo Compounds
0
Cilastatin
141A6AMN38
Imipenem
71OTZ9ZE0A
Tazobactam
SE10G96M8W
Piperacillin
X00B0D5O0E
relebactam
Y1MYA2UHFL
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02493764']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e4539-e4548Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI135964
Pays : United States
Organisme : Merck Sharp and Dohme
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Références
Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):213-26
pubmed: 4023479
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Oct;39:106-112
pubmed: 29154024
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;89:55-61
pubmed: 31479762
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jul 1;73(7):1872-1879
pubmed: 29659861
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1799-1808
pubmed: 31400759
J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 19;219(10):1536-1544
pubmed: 30649434
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Dec;48(6):740-743
pubmed: 28128097
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Feb 23;62(3):
pubmed: 29311084
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6234-43
pubmed: 27503659
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jun;43(6):533-9
pubmed: 24856078
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111
pubmed: 27418577
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):285-295
pubmed: 29254862
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1198-208
pubmed: 24670166
Respirology. 2017 Oct;22(7):1288-1299
pubmed: 28681941
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1804-13
pubmed: 20463340
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jan;55(1):105841
pubmed: 31704217
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;8(10):748-758
pubmed: 31508899
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):150
pubmed: 31272373
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug;59(8):4856-60
pubmed: 26033723
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Oct;68(10):2286-90
pubmed: 23696619
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 May 25;62(6):
pubmed: 29610205
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018 Dec;15:140-147
pubmed: 30071354
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1464-1475
pubmed: 28733718
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9):
pubmed: 29914955
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2616-2626
pubmed: 28575389
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 21;18(6):596
pubmed: 25412897
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Apr 26;62(5):
pubmed: 29507068
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;88(2):171-176
pubmed: 28291628
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;32(6):609-616
pubmed: 31567571
Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 10;50(3):
pubmed: 28890434
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1299-1311
pubmed: 31563344
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):e710-e718
pubmed: 33720350