Characteristic Components and Authenticity Evaluation of Rape, Acacia, and Linden Honey.
assessment criteria
fingerprints
monofloral honey
phytochemicals
Journal
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
ISSN: 1520-5118
Titre abrégé: J Agric Food Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2020
09 Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
26
1
2021
entrez:
14
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Honey fraud has an extensive global magnitude and impacts both honey price and beekeeper viability. This study aimed at investigating the characteristic phytochemicals of rape, acacia, and linden honey to verify honey authenticity. We discovered methyl syringate, phaseic acid, and lindenin (4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl) cyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylic acid) as particular or unique phytochemicals of rape, acacia, and linden honey. Methyl syringate and lindenin were the most abundant components in rape and linden honey; moreover, their average contents reached up to 10.44 and 21.25 mg/kg, respectively. The average content of phaseic acid was 0.63 mg/kg in acacia honey. To our knowledge, the presence of phaseic acid in honey is a novel finding. Furthermore, we established the HPLC fingerprints of three monofloral honeys. We offered assessment criteria and combined characteristic components with standard fingerprints to evaluate the authenticity of commercial rape, acacia, and linden honeys. For uncertain commercial honey samples, genuine pure honeys constituted nearly 70%. We differentiate the adulteration of acacia and linden honeys with low-price rape honey. Our results reveal that 10% of commercial honeys were pure syrups. Overall, we seem to propose a novel and reliable solution to assess the authenticity of monofloral honey.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32790307
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05070
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phytochemicals
0
Sesquiterpenes
0
phaseic acid
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM