Developing and validating a questionnaire for mortality follow-back studies on end-of-life care and decision-making in a resource-poor Caribbean country.
Caribbean region
Developing country
Methodology
Questionnaire design
Terminal care
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2020
14 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2019
accepted:
06
08
2020
entrez:
16
8
2020
pubmed:
17
8
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Palliative and end-of-life care development is hindered by a lack of information about the circumstances surrounding dying in developing and resource-poor countries. Our aims were to develop and obtain face and content validity for a self-administered questionnaire on end-of-life care provision and medical decision-making for use in population-based surveys. Modelled on validated questionnaires from research in developed countries, our questionnaire was adapted to the cultural sensitivity and medico-legal context of Trinidad and Tobago. Two sets of semi-structured face-to-face cognitive interviews were done with a sample of physicians, sampling was purposive. Phase 1 assessed interpretation of the questions, terminology and content of the questionnaire. Phase 2 was tested on a heterogeneous group of physicians to identify and fix problematic questions or recurring issues. Adjustments were made incrementally and re-tested in successive interviews. Eighteen physicians were interviewed nationwide. Adaptations to questionnaires used in developed countries included: addition of a definition of palliative care, change of sensitive words like expedited to influenced, adjustments to question formulations, follow-up questions and answer options on medications used were added, the sequence, title and layout were changed and instructions for completion were included at the beginning of the questionnaire. A new instrument for assessing and documenting end-of-life care and circumstances of dying in a small, resource-poor Caribbean country was developed and validated, and can be readily used as a mortality follow-back instrument. Our methods and procedures of development can be applied as a guide for similar studies in other small developing countries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Palliative and end-of-life care development is hindered by a lack of information about the circumstances surrounding dying in developing and resource-poor countries. Our aims were to develop and obtain face and content validity for a self-administered questionnaire on end-of-life care provision and medical decision-making for use in population-based surveys.
METHODS
METHODS
Modelled on validated questionnaires from research in developed countries, our questionnaire was adapted to the cultural sensitivity and medico-legal context of Trinidad and Tobago. Two sets of semi-structured face-to-face cognitive interviews were done with a sample of physicians, sampling was purposive. Phase 1 assessed interpretation of the questions, terminology and content of the questionnaire. Phase 2 was tested on a heterogeneous group of physicians to identify and fix problematic questions or recurring issues. Adjustments were made incrementally and re-tested in successive interviews.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighteen physicians were interviewed nationwide. Adaptations to questionnaires used in developed countries included: addition of a definition of palliative care, change of sensitive words like expedited to influenced, adjustments to question formulations, follow-up questions and answer options on medications used were added, the sequence, title and layout were changed and instructions for completion were included at the beginning of the questionnaire.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A new instrument for assessing and documenting end-of-life care and circumstances of dying in a small, resource-poor Caribbean country was developed and validated, and can be readily used as a mortality follow-back instrument. Our methods and procedures of development can be applied as a guide for similar studies in other small developing countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32795270
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00630-0
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00630-0
pmc: PMC7427774
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
123Subventions
Organisme : The Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel: Strategic Research Programs
ID : SRP4
Références
Health Policy. 1992 Sep;21(1-2):vi-x, 1-262
pubmed: 10145729
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):234-43
pubmed: 17239058
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):54-68
pubmed: 19892510
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1391-1454
pubmed: 29032993
BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 08;7:283
pubmed: 17922894
BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 27;8:299
pubmed: 18752659
Palliat Med. 2007 Apr;21(3):173-5
pubmed: 17641071
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Feb 28;42:e15
pubmed: 31093044
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2037-56
pubmed: 16316437
J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S42-9
pubmed: 16499468
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Feb 24;7:99-113
pubmed: 26955298
CMAJ Open. 2016 May 05;4(2):E222-9
pubmed: 27398367
J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):352-8
pubmed: 22401357
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 18;:
pubmed: 30659046
Palliat Med. 2006 Jan;20(1):3-10
pubmed: 16482752
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jun;45(6):1094-106
pubmed: 23017628
N Z Med J. 2015 Aug 07;128(1418):27-39
pubmed: 26367357
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):17-24
pubmed: 26202254
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):839-51
pubmed: 21620643
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1119-21
pubmed: 19741238
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Dec;35(4):477-506
pubmed: 22947596
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Aug;24(2):91-6
pubmed: 12231124