Heterologous expression of a glycosyl hydrolase and cellular reprogramming enable Zymomonas mobilis growth on cellobiose.
Adaptation, Physiological
/ physiology
Biomass
Cellobiose
/ metabolism
Cellular Reprogramming
/ genetics
Cellulose
/ metabolism
Gene Expression
/ genetics
Glucose
/ metabolism
Hydrolases
/ metabolism
Proteomics
Sucrase
/ metabolism
Sucrose
/ metabolism
Zymomonas
/ genetics
beta-Glucosidase
/ metabolism
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
11
2019
accepted:
14
07
2020
entrez:
16
8
2020
pubmed:
17
8
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant-derived fuels and chemicals from renewable biomass have significant potential to replace reliance on petroleum and improve global carbon balance. However, plant biomass contains significant fractions of oligosaccharides that are not usable natively by many industrial microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Zymomonas mobilis. Even after chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis, some carbohydrate remains as non-metabolizable oligosaccharides (e.g., cellobiose or longer cellulose-derived oligomers), thus reducing the efficiency of conversion to useful products. To begin to address this problem for Z. mobilis, we engineered a strain (Z. mobilis GH3) that expresses a glycosyl hydrolase (GH) with β-glucosidase activity from a related α-proteobacterial species, Caulobacter crescentus, and subjected it to an adaptation in cellobiose medium. Growth on cellobiose was achieved after a prolonged lag phase in cellobiose medium that induced changes in gene expression and cell composition, including increased expression and extracellular release of GH. These changes were reversible upon growth in glucose-containing medium, meaning they did not result from genetic mutation but could be retained upon transfer of cells to fresh cellobiose medium. After adaptation to cellobiose, our GH-expressing strain was able to convert about 50% of cellobiose to glucose within 24 h and use it for growth and ethanol production. Alternatively, pre-growth of Z. mobilis GH3 in sucrose medium enabled immediate growth on cellobiose. Proteomic analysis of cellobiose- and sucrose-adapted strains revealed upregulation of secretion-, transport-, and outer membrane-related proteins, which may aid release or surface display of GHs, entry of cellobiose into the periplasm, or both. Our two key findings are that Z. mobilis can be reprogrammed to grow on cellobiose as a sole carbon source and that this reprogramming is related to a natural response of Z. mobilis to sucrose that promotes sucrase production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32797046
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226235
pii: PONE-D-19-32276
pmc: PMC7428164
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cellobiose
16462-44-5
Sucrose
57-50-1
Cellulose
9004-34-6
Hydrolases
EC 3.-
beta-Glucosidase
EC 3.2.1.21
Sucrase
EC 3.2.1.48
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0226235Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Arch Microbiol. 1995 Mar;163(3):195-204
pubmed: 7778976
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1996 Dec 1;16(2):63-76
pubmed: 8988388
Science. 2014 Jan 17;343(6168):277-80
pubmed: 24436415
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Oct;75(20):6613-5
pubmed: 19684165
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1367-72
pubmed: 19029910
Biotechnol Lett. 2005 Feb;27(4):259-63
pubmed: 15742147
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):496-8
pubmed: 7125659
Nat Protoc. 2016 Dec;11(12):2301-2319
pubmed: 27809316
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Sep;13(9):2513-26
pubmed: 24942700
Arch Microbiol. 2009 Jun;191(6):529-41
pubmed: 19415238
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6360-9
pubmed: 20693448
PLoS Genet. 2016 Oct 14;12(10):e1006372
pubmed: 27741250
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jul 02;7:101
pubmed: 25024744
Science. 1995 Jan 13;267(5195):240-3
pubmed: 17791346
J Biol Chem. 1965 Sep;240(9):3685-92
pubmed: 4284300
Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14
pubmed: 20132535
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19949-54
pubmed: 22123987
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D506-D515
pubmed: 30395287
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3613-7
pubmed: 12824378
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):10039-44
pubmed: 23630264
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Dec;62(12):4465-70
pubmed: 8953718
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Apr;2(4):a000307
pubmed: 20452938
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 May 2;11:125
pubmed: 29743953
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):504-9
pubmed: 21187422
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;46(5):386-408
pubmed: 21819231
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Nov 26;8:195
pubmed: 26617670
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Mar 1;244(1):85-92
pubmed: 15727825
Nat Methods. 2016 Sep;13(9):731-40
pubmed: 27348712
Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):1-46
pubmed: 16585
Microb Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;9(6):699-717
pubmed: 27629544
Protein Sci. 2003 Aug;12(8):1652-62
pubmed: 12876315
Metab Eng. 2018 Nov;50:57-73
pubmed: 29627506
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78(4):708-13
pubmed: 25036971
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(4):671-6
pubmed: 15012804
J Bacteriol. 1974 Sep;119(3):736-47
pubmed: 4604283