Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of a Commercially Available Auto-segmentation Tool for Gross Tumour Volume Delineation in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Feasibility Study.
auto-contouring
delineation
non-small cell lung cancer
target volume definition
Journal
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
15
06
2020
revised:
24
06
2020
accepted:
24
07
2020
pubmed:
17
8
2020
medline:
15
10
2021
entrez:
17
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To quantify the reliability of a commercially available auto-segmentation tool in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using serial four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Eight patients with serial 4DCT scans (n = 44) acquired over the course of radiotherapy were assessed. Each 4DCT had a physician-defined primary tumour manual contour (MC). An auto-contour (AC) and a user-adjusted auto-contour (UA-AC) were created for each scan. Geometric agreement of the AC and the UA-AC to the MC was assessed using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the centre of mass (COM) shift from the MC and the structure volume difference from the MC. Bland Altman analysis was carried out to assess agreement between contouring methods. Dosimetric reliability was assessed by comparison of planning target volume dose coverage on the MC and UA-AC. The time trend analysis of the geometric accuracy measures from the initial planning scan through to the final scan for each patient was evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test to assess the reliability of the UA-AC over the duration of radiotherapy. User adjustment significantly improved all geometric comparison metrics over the AC alone. Improved agreement was observed in smaller tumours not abutting normal soft tissue and median values for geometric comparisons to the MC for DSC, tumour volume difference and COM offset were 0.80 (range 0.49-0.89), 0.8 cm These findings suggest that the UA-AC can produce geometrically and dosimetrically acceptable contours for appropriately selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Larger studies are required to confirm the findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32798158
pii: S0936-6555(20)30309-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.019
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
155-162Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.