Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 21 04 2020
revised: 16 06 2020
accepted: 17 06 2020
pubmed: 18 8 2020
medline: 24 9 2020
entrez: 18 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The appropriate age range for breast cancer screening remains a matter of debate. We aimed to estimate the effect of mammographic screening at ages 40-48 years on breast cancer mortality. We did a randomised, controlled trial involving 23 breast screening units across Great Britain. We randomly assigned women aged 39-41 years, using individual randomisation, stratified by general practice, in a 1:2 ratio, to yearly mammographic screening from the year of inclusion in the trial up to and including the calendar year that they reached age 48 years (intervention group), or to standard care of no screening until the invitation to their first National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) screen at approximately age 50 years (control group). Women in the intervention group were recruited by postal invitation. Women in the control group were unaware of the study. The primary endpoint was mortality from breast cancers (with breast cancer coded as the underlying cause of death) diagnosed during the intervention period, before the participant's first NHSBSP screen. To study the timing of the mortality effect, we analysed the results in different follow-up periods. Women were included in the primary comparison regardless of compliance with randomisation status (intention-to-treat analysis). This Article reports on long-term follow-up analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN24647151. 160 921 women were recruited between Oct 14, 1990, and Sept 24, 1997. 53 883 women (33·5%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 106 953 (66·5%) to the control group. Between randomisation and Feb 28, 2017, women were followed up for a median of 22·8 years (IQR 21·8-24·0). We observed a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality at 10 years of follow-up, with 83 breast cancer deaths in the intervention group versus 219 in the control group (relative rate [RR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·58-0·97]; p=0·029). No significant reduction was observed thereafter, with 126 deaths versus 255 deaths occurring after more than 10 years of follow-up (RR 0·98 [0·79-1·22]; p=0·86). Yearly mammography before age 50 years, commencing at age 40 or 41 years, was associated with a relative reduction in breast cancer mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years, although the absolute reduction remained constant. Reducing the lower age limit for screening from 50 to 40 years could potentially reduce breast cancer mortality. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The appropriate age range for breast cancer screening remains a matter of debate. We aimed to estimate the effect of mammographic screening at ages 40-48 years on breast cancer mortality.
METHODS
We did a randomised, controlled trial involving 23 breast screening units across Great Britain. We randomly assigned women aged 39-41 years, using individual randomisation, stratified by general practice, in a 1:2 ratio, to yearly mammographic screening from the year of inclusion in the trial up to and including the calendar year that they reached age 48 years (intervention group), or to standard care of no screening until the invitation to their first National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) screen at approximately age 50 years (control group). Women in the intervention group were recruited by postal invitation. Women in the control group were unaware of the study. The primary endpoint was mortality from breast cancers (with breast cancer coded as the underlying cause of death) diagnosed during the intervention period, before the participant's first NHSBSP screen. To study the timing of the mortality effect, we analysed the results in different follow-up periods. Women were included in the primary comparison regardless of compliance with randomisation status (intention-to-treat analysis). This Article reports on long-term follow-up analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN24647151.
FINDINGS
160 921 women were recruited between Oct 14, 1990, and Sept 24, 1997. 53 883 women (33·5%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 106 953 (66·5%) to the control group. Between randomisation and Feb 28, 2017, women were followed up for a median of 22·8 years (IQR 21·8-24·0). We observed a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality at 10 years of follow-up, with 83 breast cancer deaths in the intervention group versus 219 in the control group (relative rate [RR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·58-0·97]; p=0·029). No significant reduction was observed thereafter, with 126 deaths versus 255 deaths occurring after more than 10 years of follow-up (RR 0·98 [0·79-1·22]; p=0·86).
INTERPRETATION
Yearly mammography before age 50 years, commencing at age 40 or 41 years, was associated with a relative reduction in breast cancer mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years, although the absolute reduction remained constant. Reducing the lower age limit for screening from 50 to 40 years could potentially reduce breast cancer mortality.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32800099
pii: S1470-2045(20)30398-3
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30398-3
pmc: PMC7491203
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN24647151']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1165-1172

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 106/0001
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PR-PRU-1217-2601
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

BMJ. 2015 Oct 06;351:h4901
pubmed: 26442924
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):154-157
pubmed: 29150482
J Med Screen. 2010;17(1):37-43
pubmed: 20356944
Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):1017-29
pubmed: 9160496
J Med Screen. 2015 Jun;22(2):65-8
pubmed: 25767104
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):46-56
pubmed: 31766052
J Med Screen. 2011;18(2):96-102
pubmed: 21852703
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):43-7
pubmed: 9709274
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jan;1(1):8-14
pubmed: 17411511
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):W292-5
pubmed: 22358028
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):278-82
pubmed: 21355457
Lancet. 2006 Dec 9;368(9552):2053-60
pubmed: 17161727
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96
pubmed: 26757170
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2758-64
pubmed: 20837718
Circulation. 2017 May 23;135(21):1985-1987
pubmed: 28533316
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614
pubmed: 26501536
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1159-63
pubmed: 24991022
IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
pubmed: 3329634
Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;125(4):515-523
pubmed: 30411328
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Oct;14(10):1732-1742
pubmed: 31260833
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1123-1132
pubmed: 26206144

Auteurs

Stephen W Duffy (SW)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: s.w.duffy@qmul.ac.uk.

Daniel Vulkan (D)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Howard Cuckle (H)

Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Dharmishta Parmar (D)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Shama Sheikh (S)

Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK.

Robert A Smith (RA)

American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Andrew Evans (A)

Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Oleg Blyuss (O)

School of Physics, Astronomy, and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK; Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

Louise Johns (L)

Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK.

Ian O Ellis (IO)

Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Jonathan Myles (J)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Peter D Sasieni (PD)

Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK.

Sue M Moss (SM)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH