Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Large Health Maintenance Organization: Retrospective Application of a Clinical Algorithm.


Journal

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
ISSN: 1553-4669
Titre abrégé: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101235322

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 21 06 2020
revised: 07 08 2020
accepted: 10 08 2020
pubmed: 19 8 2020
medline: 27 8 2021
entrez: 19 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The primary objective was to describe practice patterns of benign hysterectomy within a large community health maintenance organization (HMO) and evaluate clinical and surgeon characteristics associated with the performance of vaginal hysterectomy (VH). Secondary objectives were to retrospectively apply a VH algorithm to determine how our practice patterns conform, and compare rates of perioperative complications among patients who did and did not meet the algorithm. Patient and surgeon characteristics, and perioperative complications, were compared between patients who underwent VH and did or did not meet the VH algorithm. Retrospective cohort study. Large community HMO. Women undergoing benign hysterectomy. None. Route of hysterectomy, patient and surgeon characteristics, perioperative complications. One hundred and thirty-one of 984 (13.3%) benign hysterectomies from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015 were vaginal. Patients who were vaginally parous, Hispanic, had normal preoperative uterine size and documentation of uterine descent were more likely to have VH (all p <.05). High-volume surgeons performed 18.8% of their hysterectomies vaginally, as compared to low-volume surgeons who performed 11.4% of their hysterectomies vaginally (p <.01). VH were more likely to be performed by surgeons with longer practice durations than non-vaginal hysterectomies (16.3 vs 12.2 years, p <.01). Seventy-five percent of patients who met the VH algorithm underwent non-vaginal hysterectomy and they had longer operative durations and higher rates of postoperative complications compared to patients who underwent VH. Conversely, patients who underwent VH despite not meeting the VH algorithm did not have significantly different rates of perioperative complications or blood loss than patients who met the VH algorithm. Seventy-five percent of patients deemed appropriate for VH by our algorithm underwent non-vaginal hysterectomy and had more postoperative complications and longer operative durations. Our data suggest that surgeon characteristics, including surgical volume and duration of practice, may explain some of this performance gap. These findings contribute additional insight into current practice patterns and describe clinical factors that should be included in VH algorithms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32810604
pii: S1553-4650(20)30383-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

881-890

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kristen Buono (K)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li).

Emily Adams-Piper (E)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li).

Kimaya Gokhale (K)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li).

Qiaowu Li (Q)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li).

Noelani Guaderrama (N)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li).

Emily L Whitcomb (EL)

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine Medical Center, Irvine (Drs. Buono, Adams-Piper, Guaderrama and Whitcomb and Ms. Gokhale); Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr. Buono); Divsion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose Medical Center, San Jose (Dr. Adams-Piper); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena (Mrs. Li),. Electronic address: Emily.l.whitcomb@kp.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH