The influence of internal models on feedback-related brain activity.
Event-related potentials
Feedback processing
Model-based learning
Model-free learning
Reinforcement learning
Time-frequency analysis
Journal
Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1531-135X
Titre abrégé: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101083946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
8
2020
medline:
1
9
2021
entrez:
20
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Decision making relies on the interplay between two distinct learning mechanisms, namely habitual model-free learning and goal-directed model-based learning. Recent literature suggests that this interplay is significantly shaped by the environmental structure as represented by an internal model. We employed a modified two-stage but one-decision Markov decision task to investigate how two internal models differing in the predictability of stage transitions influence the neural correlates of feedback processing. Our results demonstrate that fronto-central theta and the feedback-related negativity (FRN), two correlates of reward prediction errors in the medial frontal cortex, are independent of the internal representations of the environmental structure. In contrast, centro-parietal delta and the P3, two correlates possibly reflecting feedback evaluation in working memory, were highly susceptible to the underlying internal model. Model-based analyses of single-trial activity showed a comparable pattern, indicating that while the computation of unsigned reward prediction errors is represented by theta and the FRN irrespective of the internal models, the P3 adapts to the internal representation of an environment. Our findings further substantiate the assumption that the feedback-locked components under investigation reflect distinct mechanisms of feedback processing and that different internal models selectively influence these mechanisms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32812148
doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00820-6
pii: 10.3758/s13415-020-00820-6
pmc: PMC7497542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1070-1089Références
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1075-81
pubmed: 22959354
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):431-439
pubmed: 28651789
Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):905-12
pubmed: 17666029
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):48-69
pubmed: 19776734
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):19900-9
pubmed: 23086162
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:73-100
pubmed: 27687119
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):185-96
pubmed: 18708140
Neural Comput. 2006 Feb;18(2):283-328
pubmed: 16378516
Biol Psychol. 2019 Nov;148:107769
pubmed: 31525391
Biol Psychol. 2006 Feb;71(2):148-54
pubmed: 16005561
Neuron. 2014 Feb 5;81(3):687-99
pubmed: 24507199
Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
pubmed: 7584893
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:162-171
pubmed: 29758337
Cell. 2014 Sep 25;159(1):21-32
pubmed: 25259917
Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):767-72
pubmed: 25799041
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:1-10
pubmed: 24946315
Neuroreport. 2003 Dec 19;14(18):2481-4
pubmed: 14663214
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Jun;11(2):131-43
pubmed: 21416212
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 27;36(4):1211-22
pubmed: 26818509
J Physiol Paris. 2015 Feb-Jun;109(1-3):3-15
pubmed: 24787485
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):243-251
pubmed: 29208491
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):521-39
pubmed: 17936313
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1338-44
pubmed: 21926982
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):510-32
pubmed: 16060800
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Nov;22(11):2575-86
pubmed: 22120491
Neuron. 2012 Aug 9;75(3):418-24
pubmed: 22884326
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48
pubmed: 17573239
Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208
pubmed: 18870876
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):213-35
pubmed: 25495239
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):751-61
pubmed: 23558545
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):788-98
pubmed: 23964600
Cereb Cortex. 2005 May;15(5):535-44
pubmed: 15319308
Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):495-501
pubmed: 16102533
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 07;6:304
pubmed: 23162451
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 22;108(47):19048-53
pubmed: 22065792
J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 8;34(41):13747-56
pubmed: 25297101
Neuron. 2010 May 27;66(4):585-95
pubmed: 20510862
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2502-2507
pubmed: 29463751
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;18(8):414-21
pubmed: 24835663
Neuron. 2011 Mar 24;69(6):1204-15
pubmed: 21435563
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr;17(2):406-421
pubmed: 28050805
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:205-16
pubmed: 25676913
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Sep;36(8):1870-84
pubmed: 22683741
Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):161-70
pubmed: 15787853
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11
pubmed: 16286932
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jul;28(4):441-8
pubmed: 15289008
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):473-92
pubmed: 24647659
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3198-209
pubmed: 19969093
Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
pubmed: 12374324
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 24;7:253
pubmed: 24399925
Psychophysiology. 2015 May;52(5):626-37
pubmed: 25581491
J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14;24(28):6258-64
pubmed: 15254080
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):59-70
pubmed: 19246327
J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 10;27(2):371-8
pubmed: 17215398
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Apr;27(7):1823-35
pubmed: 18380674
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):276-286
pubmed: 26196667
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Apr;23(4):936-46
pubmed: 20146610
Neural Netw. 1999 Oct;12(7-8):961-974
pubmed: 12662639
Physiol Behav. 2016 Jul 1;161:24-32
pubmed: 27059320
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):555-79
pubmed: 16596980
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):523-36
pubmed: 25801925
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 25;1286:114-22
pubmed: 19539614
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499