Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department.
emergency department
human error
quality improvement
quality improvement methodologies
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
02
06
2020
revised:
21
07
2020
accepted:
27
07
2020
entrez:
21
8
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
17
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Effective handover between junior doctors is widely accepted as essential for patient safety. The British Medical Association in association with the National Health Service (NHS) National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Modernisation Agency have produced clear guidance regarding the contents and setting for a safe and efficient handover. We aimed to understand current junior doctor's opinions on the handover process in a London emergency department (ED), with subsequent assessment, and any necessary improvement, of handover practices within the department. In a London ED, a baseline survey was completed by the senior house officer (SHO) cohort to gauge current opinions of the existing handover process. Concurrently, a blinded prospective audit of handover practises was conducted. Multiple improvement strategies were subsequently implemented and assessed via Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. A standard operating procedure was initially introduced and 'rolled out' throughout the department. This intervention was followed by development of an electronic handover note to ease completion of a satisfactory handover. Additional surveys were conducted to continually assess SHO opinion on how the handover process was developing. The final improvement strategy was formal handover teaching at the SHO induction. Baseline audit and SHO survey highlighted several opportunities for improvement. 5 handover components were deemed essential: (1) documented handover note; (2) doctor's names; (3) history of presenting complaint; (4) ED actions; and (5) ongoing plan. The frequency of these components saw significant improvement by completion of the final PDSA. Following SHO rotation, all of the essential components fell, only to recover after the next improvement strategy. Junior doctors in a London ED were not satisfied with the current SHO handover process, and handover practices were not adequate. While the rotational nature of the SHO cohort makes sustained change challenging, implementation of thoughtful and realistic improvement strategies can significantly improve handover quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32816811
pii: bmjoq-2020-001032
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001032
pmc: PMC7437714
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Feb 26;2(2):
pubmed: 26734244
Crit Care Med. 2002 Oct;30(10):2322-9
pubmed: 12394962
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Mar 16;6(1):
pubmed: 28352468
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Apr 28;6(1):
pubmed: 28469904
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 25;7(3):e000215
pubmed: 30094343
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Mar 05;4(1):
pubmed: 26734349
Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Mar;15(2):115-7
pubmed: 9115506
Emerg Med J. 2012 Dec;29(12):941-6
pubmed: 22215174
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Aug 21;2(1):
pubmed: 26734174
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Apr;12(2):124-7
pubmed: 22586785
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):128-33
pubmed: 21209133