Multimodal physical therapy versus topical lidocaine for provoked vestibulodynia: a multicenter, randomized trial.


Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 25 04 2020
revised: 19 07 2020
accepted: 13 08 2020
pubmed: 21 8 2020
medline: 17 2 2021
entrez: 21 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Provoked vestibulodynia is the most common subtype of chronic vulvar pain. This highly prevalent and debilitating condition is characterized by acute recurrent pain located at the entry of the vagina in response to pressure application or attempted vaginal penetration. Although physical therapy is advocated as a first-line treatment for provoked vestibulodynia, evidence supporting its efficacy is scarce. The purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy of multimodal physical therapy compared with topical lidocaine, a frequently used first-line treatment. We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial in women diagnosed as having provoked vestibulodynia recruited from the community and 4 Canadian university hospitals. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either weekly sessions of physical therapy or overnight topical lidocaine (5% ointment) for 10 weeks. Randomization was stratified by center using random permuted blocks from a computer-generated list managed by an independent individual. Physical therapy entailed education, pelvic floor muscle exercises with biofeedback, manual therapy, and dilation. Assessments were conducted at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up. Outcome assessors, investigators, and data analysts were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was pain intensity during intercourse evaluated with the numeric rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes included pain quality (McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire), sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index), sexual distress (Female Sexual Distress Scale), satisfaction (numeric rating scale of 0-10), and participants' impression of change (Patient Global Impression of Change). Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using piecewise linear-growth models. Among 212 women who were recruited and randomized, 201 (95%) completed the posttreatment assessment and 195 (92%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Multimodal physical therapy was more effective than lidocaine for reducing pain intensity during intercourse (between-group pre-post slope difference, P<.001; mean group postdifference, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.3), and results were maintained at 6-month follow-up (mean group difference, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.5). The physical therapy group also performed better than the lidocaine group in all secondary outcomes (pain quality, sexual function, sexual distress, satisfaction, and participants' impression of change) at posttreatment and 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the changes observed after physical therapy were shown to be clinically meaningful. Regarding participants' impression of change, 79% of women in the physical therapy group reported being very much or much improved compared with 39% in the lidocaine group (P<.001). The findings provide strong evidence that physical therapy is effective for pain, sexual function, and sexual distress and support its recommendation as the first-line treatment of choice for provoked vestibulodynia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Provoked vestibulodynia is the most common subtype of chronic vulvar pain. This highly prevalent and debilitating condition is characterized by acute recurrent pain located at the entry of the vagina in response to pressure application or attempted vaginal penetration. Although physical therapy is advocated as a first-line treatment for provoked vestibulodynia, evidence supporting its efficacy is scarce.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy of multimodal physical therapy compared with topical lidocaine, a frequently used first-line treatment.
STUDY DESIGN
We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial in women diagnosed as having provoked vestibulodynia recruited from the community and 4 Canadian university hospitals. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either weekly sessions of physical therapy or overnight topical lidocaine (5% ointment) for 10 weeks. Randomization was stratified by center using random permuted blocks from a computer-generated list managed by an independent individual. Physical therapy entailed education, pelvic floor muscle exercises with biofeedback, manual therapy, and dilation. Assessments were conducted at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up. Outcome assessors, investigators, and data analysts were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was pain intensity during intercourse evaluated with the numeric rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes included pain quality (McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire), sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index), sexual distress (Female Sexual Distress Scale), satisfaction (numeric rating scale of 0-10), and participants' impression of change (Patient Global Impression of Change). Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using piecewise linear-growth models.
RESULTS
Among 212 women who were recruited and randomized, 201 (95%) completed the posttreatment assessment and 195 (92%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Multimodal physical therapy was more effective than lidocaine for reducing pain intensity during intercourse (between-group pre-post slope difference, P<.001; mean group postdifference, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.3), and results were maintained at 6-month follow-up (mean group difference, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.5). The physical therapy group also performed better than the lidocaine group in all secondary outcomes (pain quality, sexual function, sexual distress, satisfaction, and participants' impression of change) at posttreatment and 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the changes observed after physical therapy were shown to be clinically meaningful. Regarding participants' impression of change, 79% of women in the physical therapy group reported being very much or much improved compared with 39% in the lidocaine group (P<.001).
CONCLUSION
The findings provide strong evidence that physical therapy is effective for pain, sexual function, and sexual distress and support its recommendation as the first-line treatment of choice for provoked vestibulodynia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32818475
pii: S0002-9378(20)30866-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.038
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Local 0
Lidocaine 98PI200987

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01455350']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

189.e1-189.e12

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-115028
Pays : Canada

Investigateurs

Isabelle Girard (I)
Yves-André Bureau (YA)
Stéphane Ouellet (S)
Barbara Reichetzer (B)
Laurence Simard-Émond (L)
Ian Brochu (I)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mélanie Morin (M)

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke and Research Center of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Electronic address: Melanie.M.Morin@usherbrooke.ca.

Chantale Dumoulin (C)

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal and Research Center of the Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Sophie Bergeron (S)

Department of Psychology, University de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Marie-Hélène Mayrand (MH)

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal and Research Center of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Samir Khalifé (S)

Jewish General Hospital and Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Guy Waddell (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Sherbrooke and Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Marie-France Dubois (MF)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke and Research Center on Aging, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH