Diagnosis-linked antibiotic prescribing in Swedish primary care - a comparison between in-hours and out-of-hours.
Adolescent
Adult
After-Hours Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Child
Child, Preschool
Databases, Factual
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Infant
Infections
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Referral and Consultation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Sweden
/ epidemiology
Antibiotic prescribing
Diagnosis-linked prescription
Electronic health records
In-hours
Infectious disease
Out-of-hours service
Primary care
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2020
20 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
10
08
2020
entrez:
22
8
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The rise in antibiotic resistance is a global public health concern, and antibiotic overuse needs to be reduced. Earlier studies of out-of-hours care have indicated that antibiotic prescribing is less appropriate than that of in-hours care. However, no study has compared the out-of-hours treatment of infections to in-hours treatment within the same population. This retrospective, descriptive study was based on data retrieved from the Kronoberg Infection Database in Primary Care (KIDPC), which consists of all visits to primary care with an infection diagnosis or prescription of antibiotics during 2006-2014. The purpose was to study the trends in antibiotic prescribing and to compare consultations and prescriptions between in-hours and out-of-hours. The visit rate for all infections was 434 visits per 1000 inhabitants per year. The visit rate was stable during the study period, but the antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 266 prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants in 2006 to 194 prescriptions in 2014 (mean annual change - 8.5 [95% CI - 11.9 to - 5.2]). For the out-of-hours visits (12% of the total visits), a similar reduction in antibiotic prescribing was seen. The decrease was most apparent among children and in respiratory tract infections. When antibiotic prescribing during out-of-hours was compared to in-hours, the unadjusted relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.37 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.38), but when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis, the relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.10). The reduction after adjustment was largely explained by a higher visit rate during out-of-hours for infections requiring antibiotics (acute otitis media, pharyngotonsillitis, and lower urinary tract infection). The choices of antibiotics used for common diagnoses were similar. Although the infection visit rate was unchanged over the study period, there was a significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing, especially to children and for respiratory tract infections. The higher antibiotic prescribing rate during out-of-hours was small when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis. No excess prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was seen. Therefore, interventions selectively aiming at out-of-hours centres seem to be unmotivated in a low-prescribing context.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The rise in antibiotic resistance is a global public health concern, and antibiotic overuse needs to be reduced. Earlier studies of out-of-hours care have indicated that antibiotic prescribing is less appropriate than that of in-hours care. However, no study has compared the out-of-hours treatment of infections to in-hours treatment within the same population.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective, descriptive study was based on data retrieved from the Kronoberg Infection Database in Primary Care (KIDPC), which consists of all visits to primary care with an infection diagnosis or prescription of antibiotics during 2006-2014. The purpose was to study the trends in antibiotic prescribing and to compare consultations and prescriptions between in-hours and out-of-hours.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The visit rate for all infections was 434 visits per 1000 inhabitants per year. The visit rate was stable during the study period, but the antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 266 prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants in 2006 to 194 prescriptions in 2014 (mean annual change - 8.5 [95% CI - 11.9 to - 5.2]). For the out-of-hours visits (12% of the total visits), a similar reduction in antibiotic prescribing was seen. The decrease was most apparent among children and in respiratory tract infections. When antibiotic prescribing during out-of-hours was compared to in-hours, the unadjusted relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.37 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.38), but when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis, the relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.10). The reduction after adjustment was largely explained by a higher visit rate during out-of-hours for infections requiring antibiotics (acute otitis media, pharyngotonsillitis, and lower urinary tract infection). The choices of antibiotics used for common diagnoses were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although the infection visit rate was unchanged over the study period, there was a significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing, especially to children and for respiratory tract infections. The higher antibiotic prescribing rate during out-of-hours was small when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis. No excess prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was seen. Therefore, interventions selectively aiming at out-of-hours centres seem to be unmotivated in a low-prescribing context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32819280
doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05334-7
pii: 10.1186/s12879-020-05334-7
pmc: PMC7441551
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
616Subventions
Organisme : R&D Kronoberg, Region Kronoberg
ID : 897741
Organisme : Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS)
ID : FORSS-750591
Références
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;8(9):e023154
pubmed: 30269072
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Jun;20(2):114-20
pubmed: 23998298
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Jun 12;8(2):
pubmed: 31212871
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Oct 23;128(20):2340-2
pubmed: 19096491
Lakartidningen. 2013 Apr 3-16;110(27-28):1282-4
pubmed: 23951882
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):223-7
pubmed: 21209146
Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34(5):366-71
pubmed: 12069022
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Mar;35(1):10-18
pubmed: 28277045
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):764-773
pubmed: 29147057
Lakartidningen. 2011 Jan 19-26;108(3):96-7
pubmed: 21381267
BMJ. 2010 May 18;340:c2096
pubmed: 20483949
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):709
pubmed: 27887585
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):735-6
pubmed: 10756619
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Mar;32(1):44-50
pubmed: 24635578
Lancet. 2001 Jun 9;357(9271):1851-3
pubmed: 11410197
BMJ. 2014 Mar 06;348:g1606
pubmed: 24603565
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Mar;60(1):23-8
pubmed: 14689127
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Sep;71(9):2612-9
pubmed: 27287234
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2426-2433
pubmed: 31102531
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Mar;67(656):e178-e186
pubmed: 28232364
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Dec 1;72(12):3490-3495
pubmed: 28961983
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Dec;32(4):200-7
pubmed: 25350313