Organizational Characteristics and Readiness for Tobacco-Free Workplace Program Implementation Moderates Changes in Clinician's Delivery of Smoking Interventions within Behavioral Health Treatment Clinics.
Journal
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
ISSN: 1469-994X
Titre abrégé: Nicotine Tob Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 01 2021
22 01 2021
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
17
08
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Smoking is elevated amongst individuals with behavioral health disorders, but not commonly addressed. Taking Texas Tobacco Free is an evidence-based, tobacco-free workplace program that addresses this, in-part, by providing clinician training to treat tobacco use in local mental health authorities (LMHAs). This study examined organizational moderators of change in intervention delivery from pre- to post-program implementation. LMHA leaders completed the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) and provided organization demographics pre-implementation. Clinicians (N = 1237) were anonymously surveyed about their consistent use of the 5As (Asking about smoking; Advising clientele to quit; Assessing willingness to quit; Assisting them to quit; Arranging follow-up) pre- and post-program implementation. Adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used for analyses (responses nested within LMHAs), with interaction terms used to assess moderation effects. Clinician delivery of 5As increased pre- to post-implementation (p < .001). LMHAs with fewer employees (ref = ≤300) demonstrated greater increases in Asking, Assessing, and Assisting over time. LMHAs with fewer patients (ref = ≤10 000) evinced greater changes in Asking over time. Less initial ORIC Change Efficacy, Change Commitment, and Task Knowledge were each associated with greater pre- to post-implementation changes in Asking. Less initial Task Knowledge was associated with greater increases in Advising, Assessing, and Assisting. Finally, less initial Resource Availability was associated with greater increases in Assisting (all moderation term ps < .025). The smallest and least ready LMHAs showed the largest gains in tobacco cessation intervention delivery; thus, low initial readiness was not a barrier for program implementation, particularly when efficacy-building training and resources are provided. This study examined organizational moderators of increases in tobacco cessation treatment delivery over time following the implementation of a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace program within 20 of 39 LMHAs across Texas (hundreds of clinics; servicing >50% of the state) from 2013 to 2018. Overall, LMHAs with fewer employees and patients, and that demonstrated the least initial readiness for change, evinced greater gains in intervention delivery. Findings add to dissemination and implementation science by supporting that low initial readiness was not a barrier for this aspect of tobacco-free workplace program implementation when resources and clinician training sessions were provided.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Smoking is elevated amongst individuals with behavioral health disorders, but not commonly addressed. Taking Texas Tobacco Free is an evidence-based, tobacco-free workplace program that addresses this, in-part, by providing clinician training to treat tobacco use in local mental health authorities (LMHAs). This study examined organizational moderators of change in intervention delivery from pre- to post-program implementation.
METHODS
LMHA leaders completed the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) and provided organization demographics pre-implementation. Clinicians (N = 1237) were anonymously surveyed about their consistent use of the 5As (Asking about smoking; Advising clientele to quit; Assessing willingness to quit; Assisting them to quit; Arranging follow-up) pre- and post-program implementation. Adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used for analyses (responses nested within LMHAs), with interaction terms used to assess moderation effects.
RESULTS
Clinician delivery of 5As increased pre- to post-implementation (p < .001). LMHAs with fewer employees (ref = ≤300) demonstrated greater increases in Asking, Assessing, and Assisting over time. LMHAs with fewer patients (ref = ≤10 000) evinced greater changes in Asking over time. Less initial ORIC Change Efficacy, Change Commitment, and Task Knowledge were each associated with greater pre- to post-implementation changes in Asking. Less initial Task Knowledge was associated with greater increases in Advising, Assessing, and Assisting. Finally, less initial Resource Availability was associated with greater increases in Assisting (all moderation term ps < .025).
CONCLUSION
The smallest and least ready LMHAs showed the largest gains in tobacco cessation intervention delivery; thus, low initial readiness was not a barrier for program implementation, particularly when efficacy-building training and resources are provided.
IMPLICATIONS
This study examined organizational moderators of increases in tobacco cessation treatment delivery over time following the implementation of a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace program within 20 of 39 LMHAs across Texas (hundreds of clinics; servicing >50% of the state) from 2013 to 2018. Overall, LMHAs with fewer employees and patients, and that demonstrated the least initial readiness for change, evinced greater gains in intervention delivery. Findings add to dissemination and implementation science by supporting that low initial readiness was not a barrier for this aspect of tobacco-free workplace program implementation when resources and clinician training sessions were provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32832980
pii: 5896473
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa163
pmc: PMC7822101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
310-319Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
Références
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Sep 1;44(5):652-665
pubmed: 33121583
BMJ. 2014 Feb 13;348:g1151
pubmed: 24524926
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:165-185
pubmed: 27992725
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Sep;102(9):1680-1686
pubmed: 31000352
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 May;25(4):270-282
pubmed: 29498459
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):319-327
pubmed: 29955886
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):204-211
pubmed: 28397160
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):458-64
pubmed: 23440173
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):1549-55
pubmed: 23865661
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158-76
pubmed: 18617085
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:297-314 1p following 314
pubmed: 20001818
J Addict Med. 2019 Nov/Dec;13(6):470-475
pubmed: 30908345
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):737-41
pubmed: 24237916
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Nov 21;8(6):855-866
pubmed: 30202855
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Jul;18(4):561-570
pubmed: 28629277
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 May 11;67(18):519-523
pubmed: 29746451
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):796-802
pubmed: 24625143
Addict Behav. 2004 Aug;29(6):1067-83
pubmed: 15236808
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Nov 1;44(6):820-839
pubmed: 33081879
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7
pubmed: 24410955
Health Educ Res. 2009 Apr;24(2):292-305
pubmed: 18469319
J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2015;4(1):
pubmed: 26005696
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Sep;28(3):192-6
pubmed: 16809790
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Apr;99:163-170
pubmed: 30797390
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):44-53
pubmed: 20967495