Educational outcomes among children with type 1 diabetes: Whole-of-population linked-data study.
augmented inverse probability weighting
childhood
educational outcomes
linked-data
type 1 diabetes
Journal
Pediatric diabetes
ISSN: 1399-5448
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Diabetes
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 100939345
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
15
12
2019
revised:
08
07
2020
accepted:
17
08
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
19
11
2021
entrez:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Challenges with type 1 diabetes (T1D) blood glucose management and illness-related school absences potentially influence children's educational outcomes. However, evidence about the impact of T1D on children's education is mixed. The objectives were to estimate the effects of T1D on children's educational outcomes, and compare time since T1D diagnosis (recent diagnosis [≤2 years] and 3 to 10 years long exposure) on educational outcomes. This whole-of-population study used de-identified, administrative linked-data from the South Australian Early Childhood Data Project. T1D was identified from hospital ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes (E10, ranging E101 to E109), from 2001 to 2014. Educational outcomes were measured in grade 5 by the National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN, 2008-2015) for children born from 1999 to 2005. Analyses were conducted using augmented inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multiple imputations was used to impute missing data. Among 61 445 children born in South Australia who had undertaken NAPLAN assessments, 162 had T1D. There were negligible differences in the educational outcomes of children with and without T1D, and between recently diagnosed and those with longer exposure. For example, the mean reading score was 482.8 ± 78.9 for children with T1D and 475.5 ± 74.3 for other children. The average treatment effect of 6.8 (95% CI - 6.3-19.9) reflected one-tenth of a SD difference in the mean reading score of children with and without T1D. Children with T1D performed similarly on literacy and numeracy in grade 5 (age ~ 10-years) compared to children without T1D. This could be due to effective T1D management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Challenges with type 1 diabetes (T1D) blood glucose management and illness-related school absences potentially influence children's educational outcomes. However, evidence about the impact of T1D on children's education is mixed. The objectives were to estimate the effects of T1D on children's educational outcomes, and compare time since T1D diagnosis (recent diagnosis [≤2 years] and 3 to 10 years long exposure) on educational outcomes.
METHODS
This whole-of-population study used de-identified, administrative linked-data from the South Australian Early Childhood Data Project. T1D was identified from hospital ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes (E10, ranging E101 to E109), from 2001 to 2014. Educational outcomes were measured in grade 5 by the National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN, 2008-2015) for children born from 1999 to 2005. Analyses were conducted using augmented inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multiple imputations was used to impute missing data.
RESULTS
Among 61 445 children born in South Australia who had undertaken NAPLAN assessments, 162 had T1D. There were negligible differences in the educational outcomes of children with and without T1D, and between recently diagnosed and those with longer exposure. For example, the mean reading score was 482.8 ± 78.9 for children with T1D and 475.5 ± 74.3 for other children. The average treatment effect of 6.8 (95% CI - 6.3-19.9) reflected one-tenth of a SD difference in the mean reading score of children with and without T1D.
CONCLUSION
Children with T1D performed similarly on literacy and numeracy in grade 5 (age ~ 10-years) compared to children without T1D. This could be due to effective T1D management.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1353-1361Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):69-82.
Aiello LP. Diabetic retinopathy and other ocular findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):17-23.
de Boer IH. Kidney disease and related findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):24-30.
Orchard TJ, Nathan DM, Zinman B, et al. Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality. Jama. 2015;313(1):45-53.
Hannonen R, Komulainen J, Riikonen R, et al. Academic skills in children with early-onset type 1 diabetes: the effects of diabetes-related risk factors. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(5):457-463.
He J, Ryder AG, Li S, Liu W, Zhu X. Glycemic extremes are related to cognitive dysfunction in children with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investigation. 2018;9(6):1342-1353.
Hwang JJ, Jiang L, Sanchez Rangel E, et al. Glycemic variability and brain glucose levels in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2019;68(1):163-171.
Rosenthal JM, Amiel SA, Yágüez L, et al. The effect of acute hypoglycemia on brain function and activation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetes. 2001;50(7):1618-1626.
Ly TT, Gallego PH, Davis EA, Jones TW. Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in a population-based sample of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(10):1802-1806.
McCrimmon RJ, Ryan CM, Frier BM. Diabetes and cognitive dysfunction. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2291-2299.
Duca LM, Wang B, Rewers M, Rewers A. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes predicts poor long-term glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(9):1249-1255.
Lin A, Northam EA, Rankins D, Werther GA, Cameron FJ. Neuropsychological profiles of young people with type 1 diabetes 12 yr after disease onset. Pediatr Diabetes. 2010;11(4):235-243.
Gaudieri PA, Chen R, Greer TF, Holmes CS. Cognitive function in children with type 1 diabetes. A Meta-Analysis. 2008;31(9):1892-1897.
Cooper MN, McNamara KA, de Klerk NH, Davis EA, Jones TW. School performance in children with type 1 diabetes: a contemporary population-based study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17(2):101-111.
Icks A, Rosenbauer J, Holl RW, Grabert M, Rathmann W, Giani G. Hospitalization among diabetic children and adolescents and the general population in Germany. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):435-440.
Northam EA, Lin A, Finch S, Werther GA, Cameron FJ. Psychosocial well-being and functional outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes 12 years after disease onset. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1430-1437.
Dahlquist G, Kallen B, Swedish Childhood Diabetes Study G. School performance in children with type 1 diabetes-a population-based register study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(5):957-964.
Persson S, Dahlquist G, Gerdtham UG, Steen Carlsson K. Impact of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes on schooling: a population-based register study. Diabetologia. 2013;56(6):1254-1262.
Fleming M, Fitton CA, Steiner MFC, et al. Educational and health outcomes of children treated for type 1 diabetes: Scotland-wide record linkage study of 766,047 children. Diabetes Care. 2019;dc182423.42(9):1700-1707.
Skipper N, Gaulke A, Sildorf SM, Eriksen TM, Nielsen NF, Svensson J. Association of Type 1 diabetes with standardized test scores of Danish school children. Jama. 2019;321(5):484-492.
Diabetes Victoria and National Diabetes Service Scheme-NDSS. Mastering diabetes in Preschools and Schools. Accessed August 14, 2019. ndss.com.au.
Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B, et al. Association of Insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Jama. 2017;318(14):1358-1366.
Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):761-767.
Hernan MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758-764.
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(7):578-586.
Nuske T, Pilkington R, Gialamas A, Chittleborough C, Smithers L, Lynch J (2016). The SA Early Childhood Data Project. Research Series. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, 2016. Available from https://health.adelaide.edu.au/betterstart/publications/reports/sa-ecdp-report-2016.pdf Accessed May 4, 2019.
Centre for Health Record Linkage (2012). Quality assurance; Available from www.cherel.org.au/quality-assurance. Accessed February 7, 2018.
Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rouse IL, Hobbs MS. Population-based linkage of health records in Western Australia: development of a health services research linked database. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(5):453-459.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority 2017, NAPLAN Achievement in Reading, Writing, Language Conventions and Numeracy: National Report for 2017, ACARA, Sydney, 2017.
Scheil W, Jolly K, Scott J, Catcheside B, Sage L, Kennare R (2017). Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2015. Available from www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/about+us/health+statistics/pregnancy+outcome+statistics. Accessed April 2, 2018.
Australian Consortium for Classification Development (2017). The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, tenth revision, Australian modification (ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS), 10th edn. Available from www.ihpa.gov.au/what-we-do/icd-10-am-achi-acs-previous-editions. .
Dobbins TA, Simpson JM, Sullivan EA, Roberts CL. Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998-2007. MJA. 2012;197(5):291-294.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Technical paper, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2011. ABS Catalogue no. 2033.0.55.001. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2013.
National Key Centre for Social Applications of Geographical Information Systems, The University of Adelaide, and Department of Health and Aged care. Measuring Remoteness: Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA). revised edition. Occasional Papers: New Series Number 14, October 2001. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. 2001.
Stata Manual. Teffects aipw - Augmented inverse-probability weighting. stata.com.
Stata Manual. Teffects multivalued - Multivalued treatment effects. stata.com.
Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393.
Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys Wiley. NJ: Hoboken; 1987.
NAPLAN score equivalence tables 2017. Accessed April 4, 2019. https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/how-to-interpret/score-equivalence-tables
Semenkovich K, Patel PP, Pollock AB, et al. Academic abilities and glycaemic control in children and young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2016;33(5):668-673.
Hannonen R, Komulainen J, Eklund K, Tolvanen A, Riikonen R, Ahonen T. Verbal and academic skills in children with early-onset type 1 diabetes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(7):e143-e147.
Houng B, Justman M. NAPLAN Scores as Predictors of Access to Higher Education in Victoria. 2014.
Goss P, Sonnemann J, Chisholm C, Nelson L. Widening Gaps: What NAPLAN Tells us about Student Progress. Grattan Institute: Australia; 2016 (ISBN: 978-1-925015-82-9).
Cassells R, Duncan A, Abello A, D'Souza G, Nepal B. Smart Australians: Education and Innovation in Australia. AMP NATSEM: The University of Canberra; 2012.
Australian Government, Departmnet of Health. Australian Government subsidy of Continuous Glucose Monitors. Accessed April 8, 2019. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/MC15-004873-continuous-glucose-monitors.
Diabetes Victoria. . Understanding insulin pumps, Information for people with type 1 diabetes. Melbourne, Victoria: National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS), Diabetes Australia; ; 2015. .
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Insulin pump use in Australia. Diabetes series no.18. Cat. no. CVD 58. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012.
South Australia Department of Education. Managing health in education and care. Accessed August 14, 2019 https://www.education.sa.gov.au/supporting-students/health-e-safety-and-wellbeing/health-support-planning/managing-health-education-and-care/physical-health/diabetes.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Prevalence of Type 1 Diabetes among Children Aged 0-14 in Australia 2013. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2015.
Birkebaek NH, Drivvoll AK, Aakeson K, et al. Incidence of severe hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes in the Nordic countries in the period 2008-2012: association with hemoglobin a 1c and treatment modality. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000377.
Australian Government Department of Social Services . Disability and Carers. Guide to the List of Recognised Disabilities. Accessed 14, 2019. https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/disability-and-carers/benefits-payments/carer-allowance/guide-to-the-list-of-recognised-disabilities
Noorani M, Ramaiya K, Manji K. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents in a resource limited setting in Dar Es Salaam - Tanzania. BMC Endocr Disord. 2016;16(1):29.
McKinney PA, Feltbower RG, Stephenson CR, Reynolds C. Children and young people with diabetes in Yorkshire: a population-based clinical audit of patient data 2005/2006. Diabet Med. 2008;25(11):1276-1282.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in Australia 2000-2013. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2015.
Perry LB, Lubienski C, Ladwig J. How do learning environments vary by school sector and socioeconomic composition? Evidence from Australian students. Aust J Educ. 2016;60(3):175-190.