Determining the effects of Class I landfill leachate on biological nutrient removal in wastewater treatment.

Activated sludge Biological nutrient removal Co-treatment Landfill leachate Nitrification Sequencing batch reactor Specific oxygen uptake rate

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 03 05 2020
revised: 31 07 2020
accepted: 03 08 2020
pubmed: 25 8 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
entrez: 25 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The disposal of landfill leachate is a chronic problem facing the municipal solid waste industry. The composition of landfill leachate is highly variable and often dependent on site-specific conditions. Due to the potentially disruptive impact on wastewater treatment processes, wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are reluctant to accept landfill leachate for co-treatment. To improve the ability of WWTPs to screen the impact of landfill leachate and reduce landfill owners' cost of disposal, two bench scale methods were evaluated. First, six landfill leachates were screened with the specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) test, and second, the effect of leachate on the efficacy of activated sludge processes using lab scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) was determined with volumetric loading rates ranging from 5% to 20%. Results suggested that these tools can be used to estimate the impacts of leachate loading on biological processes. Both tools were able to identify loadings where biological activity was increased and inhibition of biological processes was minimized. The loading that maximized microbial activity was leachate specific and typically ranged from 5% to 10%. Taken together, these results suggest that improved landfill leachate screening and testing may improve outcomes at WWTPs by identifying a "Goldilocks" loading rate that increases biological activity. Nevertheless, our results also demonstrated that the effluent quality was degraded even at loading rates that increased biological activity. It is uncertain at this time if biological acclimation can remedy increased effluent nutrient mass loadings, suggesting further research is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32836168
pii: S0301-4797(20)31123-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111198
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sewage 0
Waste Water 0
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Nitrogen N762921K75

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111198

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ashley Danley-Thomson (A)

Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501, FGCU Blvd S, Fort Myers, Florida, USA. Electronic address: athomson@fgcu.edu.

Thomas Worley-Morse (T)

Hazen and Sawyer, 143 Union Boulevard, Suite 200, Lakewood, CO, 80228, USA.

Sandra Un Jan Contreras (SUJ)

Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501, FGCU Blvd S, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

Shane Herman (S)

Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501, FGCU Blvd S, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

Alexander Brawley (A)

Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501, FGCU Blvd S, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

Kendall Karcher (K)

Florida Gulf Coast University, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10501, FGCU Blvd S, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Hydrochemical characterization and pCO

Kunarika Bhanot, M K Sharma, R D Kaushik
1.00
Rivers Environmental Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Water Pollutants, Chemical India

Classifications MeSH