Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.


Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 09 04 2020
revised: 12 07 2020
accepted: 24 07 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 28 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prognostic role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients has not been addressed yet. To develop a risk tool predicting BCR after RP in patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy. A total of 804 patients with a clinical suspicion of PCa and positive mpMRI diagnosed with MRI-targeted plus concomitant systematic biopsy treated with RP were identified. The outcome was represented by BCR defined as two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values ≥0.2ng/ml after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the predictors of BCR. A risk tool model based on imaging and biopsy parameters was developed and validated internally. The c-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analyses were used to assess discrimination, calibration, and the net benefit associated with its use in predicting BCR at 36 mo. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 28 (25-29) mo, and 89 patients experienced BCR. The 36-mo BCR-free survival rate was 89%. The maximum diameter of the index lesion and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at mpMRI as well as the presence of clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy (defined as a grade group of >2) were associated with BCR (all p≤0.03). A model based on PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, SVI at mpMRI, diameter of the index lesion, grade group at MRI-targeted biopsy, and clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy achieved the highest discrimination (77%) among all clinical models, as well as the European Association of Urology risk groups (62%) and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score (60%). This tool was characterized by excellent calibration at internal validation and the highest net benefit when predicting BCR for the threshold risk between 0% and 30%. The adoption of predictive models accounting for mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy-derived variables and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians' ability to identify patients at a higher risk of early recurrence after surgery. The use of information obtained at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and MRI-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians' ability to identify prostate cancer patients at a higher risk of experiencing early biochemical recurrence after surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The prognostic role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients has not been addressed yet.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a risk tool predicting BCR after RP in patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A total of 804 patients with a clinical suspicion of PCa and positive mpMRI diagnosed with MRI-targeted plus concomitant systematic biopsy treated with RP were identified.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES
The outcome was represented by BCR defined as two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values ≥0.2ng/ml after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the predictors of BCR. A risk tool model based on imaging and biopsy parameters was developed and validated internally. The c-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analyses were used to assess discrimination, calibration, and the net benefit associated with its use in predicting BCR at 36 mo.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 28 (25-29) mo, and 89 patients experienced BCR. The 36-mo BCR-free survival rate was 89%. The maximum diameter of the index lesion and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at mpMRI as well as the presence of clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy (defined as a grade group of >2) were associated with BCR (all p≤0.03). A model based on PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, SVI at mpMRI, diameter of the index lesion, grade group at MRI-targeted biopsy, and clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy achieved the highest discrimination (77%) among all clinical models, as well as the European Association of Urology risk groups (62%) and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score (60%). This tool was characterized by excellent calibration at internal validation and the highest net benefit when predicting BCR for the threshold risk between 0% and 30%.
CONCLUSIONS
The adoption of predictive models accounting for mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy-derived variables and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians' ability to identify patients at a higher risk of early recurrence after surgery.
PATIENT SUMMARY
The use of information obtained at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and MRI-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians' ability to identify prostate cancer patients at a higher risk of experiencing early biochemical recurrence after surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32847747
pii: S2588-9311(20)30123-1
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.07.008
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

KLK3 protein, human EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

739-747

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Giorgio Gandaglia (G)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: Gandaglia.giorgio@hsr.it.

Guillaume Ploussard (G)

Department of Urology, Saint Jean Languedoc/La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Massimo Valerio (M)

Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Giancarlo Marra (G)

Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Marco Moschini (M)

Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Alberto Martini (A)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Mathieu Roumiguié (M)

Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

Nicola Fossati (N)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Armando Stabile (A)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Jean-Baptiste Beauval (JB)

Department of Urology, Saint Jean Languedoc/La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Bernard Malavaud (B)

Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

Simone Scuderi (S)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Barletta (F)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Luca Afferi (L)

Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Arnas Rakauskas (A)

Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Paolo Gontero (P)

Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Agostino Mattei (A)

Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Francesco Montorsi (F)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Alberto Briganti (A)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH