Physician attitudes on buprenorphine induction in the emergency department: results from a multistate survey.
Adult
Analgesics, Opioid
/ therapeutic use
Attitude of Health Personnel
Buprenorphine
/ therapeutic use
Certification
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Narcotic Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Opiate Substitution Treatment
/ methods
Opioid-Related Disorders
/ drug therapy
Physicians
United States
Buprenorphine
emergency department
opiate substitution treatment
Journal
Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1556-9519
Titre abrégé: Clin Toxicol (Phila)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101241654
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
7
9
2021
entrez:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emergency Departments (ED) are rapidly becoming an important location for initiation of buprenorphine (EDBUP) for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Previous investigations of emergency medicine physicians' perceived barriers and attitudes toward EDBUP exclusively sampled from urban, academic-affiliated physicians. We administered a multistate survey to an institutionally and geographically diverse collection of emergency medicine physicians to better understand the professional opinions of EDBUP implementation across a variety of practice settings. This cross-sectional survey study used an online survey instrument to convenience sample emergency medicine physicians. In order to sample from various practice environments, participants were identified from (1) statewide ACEP chapters and (2) Facebook groups exclusive to emergency medicine physicians. The survey explored physicians' attitudes of EDBUP adoption and the perceived barriers to doing so. 162 emergency medicine physicians completed the survey. 76% of respondents agreed that emergency medicine physicians should offer EDBUP in the treatment of OUD. When stratified by practice setting and X-waiver status, 96% of X-waivered physicians, 73% of academic physicians, 49% of non-academic physicians, and 34% of non-X-waivered physicians felt comfortable initiating EDBUP. Lack of access to outpatient MOUD referral was the most frequently cited barrier to EDBUP across all practice settings. An institutionally and geographically diverse group of emergency medicine physicians endorsed substantial support for EDBUP. Emergency medicine physicians practicing in different clinical environments endorsed similar barriers to EDBUP implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32870039
doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1805461
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Narcotic Antagonists
0
Buprenorphine
40D3SCR4GZ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM