Cost-effectiveness of a new autoantibody test added to Computed Tomography (CT) compared to CT surveillance alone in the diagnosis of lung cancer amongst patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
accepted:
28
07
2020
entrez:
3
9
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Oncimmune's EarlyCDT®-Lung is a simple ELISA blood test that measures seven lung cancer specific autoantibodies and is used in the assessment of malignancy risk in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs). The objective of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of EarlyCDT-Lung in the diagnosis of lung cancer amongst patients with IPNs in addition to CT surveillance, compared to CT surveillance alone which is the current recommendation by the British Thoracic Society guidelines. A model consisting of a combination of a decision tree and Markov model was developed using the outcome measure of the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A life-time time horizon was adopted. The model was parameterized using a range of secondary sources. At £70 per test, EarlyCDT-Lung and CT surveillance was found to be cost-effective compared to CT surveillance alone with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than £2,500 depending on the test accuracy parameters used. It was also found that EarlyCDT-Lung can be priced up to £1,177 and still be cost-effective based on cost-effectiveness acceptance threshold of £20,000 / QALY. Further research to resolve parameter uncertainty, was not found to be of value. The results here demonstrate that at £70 per test the EarlyCDT-Lung will have a positive impact on patient outcomes and coupled with CT surveillance is a cost-effective approach to the management of patients with IPNs. The conclusions drawn from this analysis are robust to realistic variation in the parameters used in the model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32877432
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237492
pii: PONE-D-19-14772
pmc: PMC7467291
doi:
Substances chimiques
Autoantibodies
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0237492Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: LJ, MF, GHF, AM, and AH are full-time employees of Oncimmune Limited. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):724-35
pubmed: 12729427
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 May;17(5):479-500
pubmed: 10977389
Health Technol Assess. 2016 May;20(40):1-146
pubmed: 27224642
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):263-270
pubmed: 28115167
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):205-216
pubmed: 29445941
Thorax. 2015 Aug;70 Suppl 2:ii1-ii54
pubmed: 26082159
PLoS One. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197826
pubmed: 29787590
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1793-802
pubmed: 25372087
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(4):1-174
pubmed: 22333291
Med Decis Making. 2014 Apr;34(3):311-26
pubmed: 24246566