Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.
Active middle ear implant
Coupling quality
Floating mass transducer
Intraoperative
Objective measures
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
07
07
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
pubmed:
4
9
2020
medline:
2
6
2021
entrez:
4
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluating the effectiveness of intraoperative auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant for quantifying the implant's floating mass transducer (FMT) coupling quality. In a diagnostic multicentric study, patients (> 18 years) who received a VSB with different coupling modalities were included. Pre- and postoperative bone conduction thresholds, intraoperative VSB-evoked ABR thresholds (VSB-ABR) using a modified audio processor programmed to preoperative bone conduction thresholds, postoperative vibrogram thresholds, and postoperative VSB-ABR thresholds were measured. Coupling quality was calculated from the difference between the pure tone average at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz (3PTA) vibrogram and postoperative 3PTA bone conduction thresholds. Twenty-three patients (13 males, 10 females, mean age 56.6 (± 12.5) years) were included in the study. Intraoperative VSB-ABR response thresholds could be obtained in all except one patient where the threshold was > 30 dB nHL. Postoperatively, an insufficient coupling of 36.7 dB was confirmed in this patient. In a Bland-Altman analysis of the intraoperative VSB-ABRs and coupling quality, the limits of agreement exceeded ± 10 dB, i.e., the maximum allowed difference considered as not clinically important but the variation was within the general precision of auditory brainstem responses to predict behavioral thresholds. Five outliers were identified. In two patients, the postoperative VSB-ABR thresholds were in agreement with the coupling quality, indicating a change of coupling before the postoperative testing. The response thresholds recorded in this set-up have the potential to predict the VSB coupling quality and optimize postoperative audiological results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32880736
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06313-z
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-06313-z
pmc: PMC8165065
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2277-2288Références
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(10):700-4
pubmed: 25997814
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Apr;146(4):633-40
pubmed: 22140205
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(8):1390-8
pubmed: 26247138
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Nov;18(6):314-323
pubmed: 28784040
Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):72-81
pubmed: 25099400
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Mar;37(3):252-66
pubmed: 26796211
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;271(3):477-82
pubmed: 23512431
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;69:1-13
pubmed: 20610908
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;86:240-5
pubmed: 27260613
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):513-9
pubmed: 27023016
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1797-1806
pubmed: 27796557
Ear Hear. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):309-19
pubmed: 25470369
Otol Neurotol. 2001 Nov;22(6):962-72
pubmed: 11698826
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3867-3873
pubmed: 28831558
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):809-814
pubmed: 28383463
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(6):316-325
pubmed: 30650421
HNO. 2016 Feb;64(2):91-100
pubmed: 26601668
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Jan;41(1):60-67
pubmed: 31746816
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):613-7
pubmed: 22429947
Int J Audiol. 2017 Aug;56(8):607-611
pubmed: 28420277
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1797
pubmed: 32019957
Ear Hear. 2006 Feb;27(1):60-74
pubmed: 16446565
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Feb;41(2):e168-e171
pubmed: 31663998
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):104-7
pubmed: 20962700
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Oct;38(9):1246-1250
pubmed: 28806311
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1250-5
pubmed: 21897320
Int J Audiol. 2006 Oct;45(10):600-8
pubmed: 17062502
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Oct;271(10):2637-40
pubmed: 24114064
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):477-481
pubmed: 30284273
HNO. 2021 Jun;69(6):475-482
pubmed: 31705301
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Dec;31(9):1365-8
pubmed: 20729778
Am J Audiol. 2019 Sep 13;28(3):553-559
pubmed: 31318578
HNO. 2018 Jul;66(Suppl 2):71-76
pubmed: 30259069