Chemical and mechanical influence of root canal irrigation on biofilm removal from lateral morphological features of simulated root canals, dentine discs and dentinal tubules.
RISA
biofilm
confocal laser scanning microscopy
optical coherence tomography
polysaccharides
sodium hypochlorite
ultrasound
Journal
International endodontic journal
ISSN: 1365-2591
Titre abrégé: Int Endod J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8004996
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
20
12
2019
accepted:
26
08
2020
pubmed:
4
9
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
entrez:
4
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the anti-biofilm efficacy of irrigation using a simulated root canal model, the chemical effect of irrigants against biofilms grown on dentine discs and their impact on biofilm viscoelasticity, the efficacy of the irrigants in decontaminating infected dentinal tubules and the capacity of bacteria to regrow. Biofilm removal, viscoelastic analysis of remaining biofilms and bacterial viability were evaluated using a simulated root canal model with lateral morphological features, dentine discs and a dentinal tubule model, respectively. Experiments were conducted using a two-phase irrigation protocol. Phase 1: a modified salt solution (RISA) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) were used at a low flow rate to evaluate the chemical action of the irrigants. Ultrasonic activation (US) of a chemically inert solution (buffer) was used to evaluate the mechanical efficacy of irrigation. Phase 2: a final irrigation with buffer at a high flow rate was performed for all groups. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), low load compression testing (LLCT) and confocal scanning laser microscopy analysis were used in the different models. One-way analysis of variance (anova) was performed for the OCT and LLCT analysis, whilst Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon ranked tests for the dentinal tubule model. US and high flow rate removed significantly more biofilm from the artificial lateral canal. For biofilm removal from the artificial isthmus, no significant differences were found between the groups. Within-group analysis revealed significant differences between the steps of the experiment, with the exception of NaOCl. For the dentine discs, no significant differences regarding biofilm removal and viscoelasticity were detected. In the dentinal tubule model, NaOCl exhibited the greatest anti-biofilm efficacy. The mechanical effect of irrigation is important for biofilm removal. An extra high flow irrigation rate resulted in greater biofilm removal than US in the artificial isthmus. The mechanical effect of US seemed to be more effective when the surface contact biofilm-irrigant was small. After the irrigation procedures, the remaining biofilm could survive after a 5-day period. RISA and NaOCl seemed to alter post-treatment remaining biofilms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32880989
doi: 10.1111/iej.13399
pmc: PMC7839520
doi:
Substances chimiques
Root Canal Irrigants
0
Sodium Hypochlorite
DY38VHM5OD
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
112-129Subventions
Organisme : European Society of Endodontology
Organisme : Abel Tasman Talent Program
Organisme : Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
ID : 2010/20196-3
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society.
Références
Int Endod J. 2014 Nov;47(11):1040-51
pubmed: 24397845
J Endod. 2003 Oct;29(10):674-8
pubmed: 14606795
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 21;6:27537
pubmed: 27325010
Int Endod J. 2003 Jul;36(7):500-8
pubmed: 12823706
J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1380-5
pubmed: 21924186
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Mar;34(2):359-366
pubmed: 30069683
PLoS One. 2013 May 27;8(5):e63750
pubmed: 23723995
J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec;184(23):6739-45
pubmed: 12426365
J Endod. 2016 Nov;42(11):1647-1650
pubmed: 27616541
Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):764-8
pubmed: 16164691
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9794
pubmed: 31278369
Int Endod J. 2018 Aug;51(8):901-911
pubmed: 29397005
J Periodontol. 1983 Feb;54(2):77-80
pubmed: 6403691
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Mar 27;63(4):
pubmed: 30745390
J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):145-9
pubmed: 26577873
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Dec;15(12):740-755
pubmed: 28944770
Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):221-30
pubmed: 12193268
J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1280-4
pubmed: 26234625
Int Endod J. 2015 Jun;48(6):542-8
pubmed: 25070009
Res Microbiol. 2005 May;156(4):506-14
pubmed: 15862449
Int Endod J. 2019 May;52(5):604-628
pubmed: 30488449
Int Endod J. 1982 Oct;15(4):187-96
pubmed: 6964523
Int Endod J. 2017 Apr;50(4):367-376
pubmed: 26993055
Braz Dent J. 2004;15(2):109-14
pubmed: 15776192
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015 Mar;39(2):234-45
pubmed: 25725015
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1999-2002
pubmed: 25266466
J Endod. 2009 Apr;35(4):493-502
pubmed: 19345793
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):712-8
pubmed: 23611398
Int Endod J. 2001 Jun;34(4):300-7
pubmed: 11482142
Int Endod J. 2021 Jan;54(1):112-129
pubmed: 32880989
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0116647
pubmed: 25635770
J Endod. 2010 Nov;36(11):1820-3
pubmed: 20951294
Microbiology (Reading). 2008 Jul;154(Pt 7):1927-1938
pubmed: 18599821
Int Endod J. 1995 May;28(3):141-8
pubmed: 8626198
Langmuir. 2014 Sep 2;30(34):10354-62
pubmed: 25117376
Int Endod J. 2016 Sep;49(9):865-873
pubmed: 26333716
J Endod. 2016 Feb;42(2):320-3
pubmed: 26723483
Int Endod J. 2007 Jun;40(6):415-26
pubmed: 17442017
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jul;8(7):471-80
pubmed: 20514044
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 May-Jun;24(3):291-8
pubmed: 27383711
Int Endod J. 2019 Apr;52(4):461-474
pubmed: 30303560
Int Endod J. 2015 Feb;48(2):153-61
pubmed: 24702260
J Endod. 2004 Nov;30(11):785-7
pubmed: 15505511
J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1291-1301.e3
pubmed: 18928835
J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Sep;91(3):525-32
pubmed: 11556920
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 May;82(5):558-563
pubmed: 30614118
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;23(6):591-8
pubmed: 26200524
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1182-1195
pubmed: 30807649
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1110-7
pubmed: 21859433
J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):652-62
pubmed: 17509401
Int Endod J. 2019 Dec;52(12):1773-1788
pubmed: 31389008
Int Endod J. 1991 Nov;24(6):308-16
pubmed: 1820364
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Dec;108(12):2968-77
pubmed: 21732324
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Sep;8(9):623-33
pubmed: 20676145
J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):326-331
pubmed: 27989584
J Bacteriol. 2003 Mar;185(5):1485-91
pubmed: 12591863
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Mar;6(3):199-210
pubmed: 18264116
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Jul;114(7):1386-1402
pubmed: 28266013
Int Endod J. 2018 Jan;51 Suppl 1:e55-e64
pubmed: 28654211
J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Aug;86(2):266-73
pubmed: 21616099
Microbiology (Reading). 1996 Mar;142 ( Pt 3):631-8
pubmed: 8868438
Int Endod J. 2018 Apr;51(4):448-456
pubmed: 28960350
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1372-6
pubmed: 20647099
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;24(6):575-581
pubmed: 28076462
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Sep-Oct;24(5):487-495
pubmed: 27812619
Caries Res. 2011;45(1):69-86
pubmed: 21346355
Int Endod J. 2017 Feb;50(2):153-160
pubmed: 26705856
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):231-52
pubmed: 15660098
J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Jul 30;46(1):9-17
pubmed: 11412909
Int Endod J. 2001 Jul;34(5):399-405
pubmed: 11482724
J Bacteriol. 2007 Nov;189(22):7945-7
pubmed: 17675377
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1277-88
pubmed: 20647081